<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to New ministry begins to bark, but still lacks bite</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about New ministry begins to bark, but still lacks bite on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2407-New-ministry-begins-to-bark-but-still-lacks-bite</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] A part of reform</title>
      <description>The discussion of the transition of environmental regulatory system in this article, understood in the current political and economic reforms, is profoundly interesting. The comparison between China and the US that helps to better understand both countries' situations, is somehow simple and not helpful in practices. The policy suggestions in the later part of the article is long in examplification but short in analysis.

Translated by Ming Li   </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7951</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7951</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The comparison with the USA</title>
      <description>In spite of the interest of your article, I wonder why you always place the USA in such a high position in comparison with other countries? Aren't you fed up with the credit crunch and the repercussions from it? Meleze</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7883</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7883</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Deep-rooted problems</title>
      <description>Upgrading to ministry status doesn't mean a solution to everything. There are still deep-rooted problems behind that need to be identified. There are no more excuses for poor performance of its environmental protection.

Translated by Ming li</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7884</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7884</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Still more to be done</title>
      <description>Beside establishing the Ministry of Environment Protection, there is still more to be done by the government. In particular, we should think about how to improve the supervising and implementing abilities, and how to create a better assessing mechanism of the governmental achievements.

This comment is translated by Merry Zou.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7868</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7868</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So how can we improve things</title>
      <description>The article says that Xiamen is doing some things right.  Can we apply the techniques used in Xiamen to other cities? </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7867</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2407#comment-7867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
