<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to Hong Kong’s idling engine</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about Hong Kong’s idling engine on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/1153-Hong-Kong-s-idling-engine</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] More HK efforts needed to deal with environment issues</title>
      <description>More efforts are needed from the HK regional government to the public to realize the urgency to deal with the environment issue in HK. 

Otherwise, HK will, sooner or later, experience the same situation as current Chinese mainland: The environment is worsening to such an extent that the issue could not be resolved in near future. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:41:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1153#comment-4002</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1153#comment-4002</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hong Kong policy and Chinese pollution</title>
      <description>It looks like environmental policy in HK was a mixed bag in the past decade. But in any case, is it the most important factor in local pollution? After all, there are many that blame the Chinese mainland for the worst of the pollution, and say that however much HK cleans up its air quality etc. then the heavily-industrialised Pearl River Delta will continue to pollute the region. What do people think? SL </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:07:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1153#comment-3997</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1153#comment-3997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
