<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to China and the US: moving forward on climate (part two)</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about China and the US: moving forward on climate (part two) on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/1668-China-and-the-US-moving-forward-on-climate-part-two-</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>Dr. Haibin Zhang on Nuclear</title>
      <description>If the choice is to spend available investment capital either on building nuclear power plants  or on increasing the efficiency of existing generating plant, transmission, and end-use technologies for electricity - where would you have to invest to help more effectively with the climate (Assuming capital is scarce) ?

BAO George    </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1668#comment-7018</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1668#comment-7018</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Robert Reich's books</title>
      <description>You should reed the books of this economist of Berkeley because the prospect  of extending the bilateralist cooperation between your country and the USA in the environment area is a consequence of his analysis of the transformation of the american trustees by a world market .
Meleze</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:54:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1668#comment-7011</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1668#comment-7011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
