<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to Governments can no longer ignore the hungry</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about Governments can no longer ignore the hungry on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/1910-Governments-can-no-longer-ignore-the-hungry</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Our options</title>
      <description>Faced with increasing grain prices, we have two options. One is to restore the ratio of prices of agricultural products to industrial products, to meet the expectations of urban dwellers. The other is to carry out more complete reform to help peasants become well-off, which is the cause we've been fighting for a long time. Institutional economists are trying to market the privatization of land, and the less extreme also support the free circulation of land. We are following the guidance of none of them, but the prices of agricultural products are still going up, which according to Steven Cheung is something applaudable. If we choose option one, we make no progress. If we choose option two, we're likely to experience chaos. I feel like choosing the path of reform! - Loyi</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:56:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1910#comment-7242</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/1910#comment-7242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
