<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to Why is China different for western brands?</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about Why is China different for western brands? on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2046-Why-is-China-different-for-western-brands-</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>It's up to the consumer to demand action</title>
      <description>Paul French is right when he says that big companies only do the right thing when consumers demand action. So why are Chinese consumers so passive? Do they not care? Are they too busy? lazy? scared? As long as Chinese consumers don't care, the companies won't care either. The west didn't get consumer protection by sitting around waiting for government to act and nor will China.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:47:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2046#comment-7454</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2046#comment-7454</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Global business standard is the solution</title>
      <description>Environmental problems cannot be solved until coordinated business standards are adopted globally.

Otherwise, all endeavors will be in vain one way or another. This is similar to the scenario where you solve one problem in one place at the price of causing similar problems elsewhere.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:57:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2046#comment-7446</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2046#comment-7446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
