Latest comments posted about Another inconvenient truth on ChinaDialogue en-gb http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2114-Another-inconvenient-truth http://staging.chinadialogue.net/images/cdlogo.gif http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2114-Another-inconvenient-truth another truth！ we，both North and South，really need to take action now，because there is only one earth！ liu Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:23:14 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-9843 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-9843 No matter how much truth and untruth he tells, the author at least sounds a warning to human beings. It is our planet! Our only planet! This comment was translated by Kate Truax. Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:12:20 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7901 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7901 IF that happens, what should people do?to prevent this happening...i don't think this gonna happen to us, because GOD is with us... Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:14:59 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7647 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7647 I'd be interested in what other readers think the implications of this article are. It seems to suggest hard choices lie ahead for China unless there are some breakthroughs in carbon capture or alternatives to coal. Martin Bunzl, www.csp.rutgers.edu Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:45:07 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7593 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7593 Well said. Glad to see that comments agree (except for comment one - come on, alarmist, but end justifies the means, surely). I think one large thing to be taken away from this is the last sentence: "The north must clearly do the same...". I hope that well targeted studies like this will dilute the shifts towards polarisation of international climate engagement. But , that said, I think it is still desireable for "the North" to help "the South". This should be done because we are all stakeholders and any investment across borders will come back to us. Any delay in doing this will come back to us. And no, people in the South will not starve quietly so people in the North can pollute as before. They will go to war. Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:28:22 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7553 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7553 If you are going to make these accusations, why don't you back it up with some detail? Otherwise you are just grandstanding and there is no reason for anyone to take your comment seriously Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:25:19 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7523 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7523 Bravo. An excellent article which makes a nonsense of "southern" assertions that its per capita emissions are small compared to those in the "north" and therefore largely irrelevant. Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:49:53 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7517 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7517 Of course the first inconvenient truth is that Al Gore was a liar and misrepresented many things in his alarmist propaganda piece. Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:25:21 +0000 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7514 http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2114#comment-7514