<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to The north is forcing the south to repeat its mistakes</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about The north is forcing the south to repeat its mistakes on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2342-The-north-is-forcing-the-south-to-repeat-its-mistakes</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>France's budget for technological transfers</title>
      <description> France never devoted more than 0.35% of its budget and mainly in Africa. The change you hope in Copenhagen is not forecast.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7845</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7845</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] The first readable analysis of the international situation of climate change</title>
      <description>I&#8217;ve read a lot of articles of the like and attended many international conferences on climate change only to get baffled. It seems that the more you know the more you are confused. Those articles are embedded with many complex models symbolic of science, and those meetings or talks are filled with high-sounding reasons to pass the buck when it comes to emission reductions. I hadn&#8217;t realized that the difficulties in climate change talks could be so briefly and clearly explained till I finished this piece.

This comment was translated by Lin Fu.
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7823</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7823</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dissatisfied with capitalism</title>
      <description>I always knew there was something wrong with capitalism. It always spurs the need for growth growth growth!

But as the article mentions, the cold war has shown that it is difficult to find an alternative.  How will we fashion our economies if not with capitalism?
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7806</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7806</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"It takes two to tango"</title>
      <description>China had the opportunity to require that inward investors adopt standards of environmental controls in their factories which would be at least as sound as if those factories were established in their home countries.

Likewise concerning workers' rights and of course legal compliance and financial probity.

China has chosen not to do so.

Similarly, clean technology is not supplied to China largely because China has chosen not to respect intellectual property rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7788</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/2342#comment-7788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
