<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ChinaDialogue: Latest responses to Taking account of China&#8217;s growth</title>
    <description>Latest comments posted about Taking account of China&#8217;s growth on ChinaDialogue</description>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/851-Taking-account-of-China-s-growth</link>
    
    <item>
      <title>Re: comment 7</title>
      <description>In my opinion, this article is very much about natural resources, but I do understand that it's a complex article and not an introductory piece. The key to understanding the thrust of the article is here: 

"Increases in a country&#8217;s total economic output will certainly mean an increase in the consumption of natural resources; pollution and environmental damage will also increase. GDP statistics only show the total economic revenue or output, and do not show environmental costs." 

SL</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3659</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3659</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hey</title>
      <description>i dont get this i asked you for some examples of china`s natural resources and you gave me the wrong thing </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 11:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3658</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] local officials are all unmoved without mentioning GDP</title>
      <description>Only the change on distributing benefits can change the ideology of those interest groups, which can either be companies or local governments. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3226</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-3226</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Don't take advantage of GDP</title>
      <description>Well-being and health cannot be measured by GDP, just like richness cannot bring happiness. What really matters are people's awareness and the correct way for protection. </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2824</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2824</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] Let us go step by step</title>
      <description>Minister Pan speaks well: let us go step by step. China's environmental protection movement has completed upon the fundamental initial stage of alerting the broader public, and has entered into the middle stage of needing a feasible solution to the problems. Now Wang Yongchen and those other highly enthusiastic prostletyzers, good at rushing about campaigning, have already entirely fulfilled their historical role. Now what's needed is a truly scientific spirit, putting one's nose to the grindstone. Based on every single link, every single detail, we must treat the illness based on the right diagnosis, so those men who earnestly and conscientously proceed step by step down the path will be able to solve China's environmental problems on the most fundamental level.  </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2612</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2612</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] How far can green GDP go? Where's the bottleneck?</title>
      <description>The thunderclap of green GDP has sounded for some time now, and it's rained a bit though still not really poured. After all, how far will it go? What problems has it run into, what bottlenecks?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2611</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2611</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>[TRANSLATED] That's absolutely challenging</title>
      <description>Green GDP, it is easier said than done, right?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2568</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2568</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GO GREEN GDP</title>
      <description>Definitely support the Green GDP</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2580</link>
      <guid>http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/summary/851#comment-2580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
