很难想象，当大象这种庞大动物经历了1000万年演变之后，同样经历了1000万年改变的生存环境，还能否接受1000万年后的子孙。
而我认为，特别是昆虫，可以说是这个地球上最庞大的动物种群之一，它们在世界各地的差异太大太大了，就拿遍布全球的蚊子来说，也有着千差万别。在现今世界，一旦把非洲的昆虫引入亚洲，把非洲的大象迁入美洲，可以想得出，那里的野生动物世界将发生怎样的战争。
植物类外来入侵物种造成生态灾难的案例，以经告诉我们绝对不能自以为是地胡来，即使是一个非常美好善良的愿望，也可能铸就永远无法校正的大错。
此文中说：最新的研究显示，在升温预期提高的条件下，热浪、干旱、以及海洋不断酸化等现象将迫使动物们离开它们的自然栖息地，并使它们的食物链遭到破坏，物种的死亡率也将随之升高到40%到70%之间。
难道以此为依据就能把人类要拯救的物种搬家吗？除了把它们搬到原来就有该种群存在的、尚未受到气候变化影响的区域，这些“看似”理想，但从未有该物种栖息的区域，肯定不会欣然接受它们这些“异族”外来居民的。
对于中国的野生动物保护来说，当前最大的威胁还是栖息地的丧失和栖息环境的恶劣趋势。若以工作的优先顺序考虑，当紧的是给出濒危物种栖息地恢复方案。例如老虎的保护和栖息地危机问题亟待解决，究竟能不能扩大一些东北虎的栖息地面积，把有虎踪迹的保护区再扩大一些，把里面的居民搬迁出来，让人有安全幸福的生活，让虎有自由行走、捕猎的可能。
也许，蝴蝶生物学家卡米尔•帕尔梅桑的研究和建议在美国境内有足够的依据，适合美国动物保护的实际。但在中国和非洲这些生物多样性远远高于美国的地区，就肯定不合适。
张可佳
大自然保护协会(TNC)中国项目员工

It's hard to imagine whether elephants, these large animals which have experienced 10 million years of evolution, and 10 million years of change in their living environment, will have descendants 10 million years from now.
As I see it, particularly insects, which you could say are one of the largest animal groups in the world, their variety in every area of the world is just incredible. Take the mosquito, for example- it is found the world over, yet there are thousands upon thousands of different kinds of mosquitoes. In the modern world, as soon as you introduce African insects to Asia, and African elephants to America, you can imagine what kind of conflicts will erupt in the wilds of these areas.
Cases of importing foreign plants leading to ecological disaster have already shown us that we must think things through properly. Although this is an extremely beautiful and good ambition, it could also lead to mistakes which could never be undone.
This article says that: The latest research has shown that under the premise of expected rises in temperature, heat, drought, as well as the incessant acidification of the oceans, among other phenomena, will force animals to leave their natural habitat, and will also break their food chains. The extinction rate of species will also rise to between 40% and 70%.
Could it be that this is the basis to make it possible to move the species humans want to save? Aside from the fact that their destinations already have species inhabiting them, to areas which have yet to be influenced by climate change, this is "seemingly" ideal, but areas which have never had these species will not be pleased to accept these foreign "alien" residents.
With regard to the conservation of wild animals in China, the biggest present threat is still the adverse trend of loss and deterioration of natural habitat. If we consider what our priorities are to be within conservation work, the most urgent thing is to undertake the recovery of the habitat of endangered species.
For instance, the protection of the tiger and the habitat crisis are matters in urgent need of resolution. Whether or not it is possible to expand the habitat area of the Siberian Tiger somewhat, and expand the conservation areas which show signs of having tigers living within them; to relocate the residents of these areas elsewhere, allowing people to have safe and happy lives, and tigers to have the freedom to move around and the possibility of hunting.
It may be the case that the research and advice of the butterfly biologist Camille Parmesan has sufficient basis in America to make it suitable for the reality of American animal conservation. However, it is certainly not suitable for China and Africa, areas with vastly greater biodiversity than America.

Zhang Kejia
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) China Project

先不说搬迁可能带来的种种后果，只说搬迁到哪里？仅仅地点选择这一项研究要付出的代价就很高，也许还没等研究明白所选择的是不是适合的地方，某个物种就消失了。
让我们留住美好自然！

耿栋 北京山水自然保护中心员工

I won't discuss all the possible consequences of relocation, just ask where they should be moved? Even just researching the choice of destination will cost a lot; perhaps a certain species will die out before it becomes clear which of the places chosen for it is suitable.
Let's retain bright nature!

Geng Dong, Beijing Shan Shui Conservation Center Staff Member

也许在生态环境来不及恢复的情况下，这也是无可奈何的选择？先把动物放在一个地方，做一个类似基因库的形式保存起来？这倒也不失为一种应急的方式，但根本上还是要保护生态环境，这才是保护物种多样性的必由之路

金桐福

Perhaps, in situations where the ecological environment cannot recover in time, this would be the only choice? First release animals in an area, and make a similar form of gene pool for purposes of preservation? This is an emergency method not to be discarded, but first and foremost the environment should still be protected. This is a necessary way of conserving biodiversity and no more.

Jin Tongfu

类似大象、熊猫、老虎这样的明星动物，或者一些植物，我们可以谈论迁地保护还是就地保护，争论如何保护它们。然而在中国，我们甚至都还不了解我们拥有什么？这些动植物的动态变化是什么？比如在西双版纳地区，对动植物的动态变化，近一二十年内有哪些动植物消失了？生物入侵的程度如何等等问题都还不清楚，我们又保护什么呢？所以问题的关键还是保护好已有的保护区，加强动态研究，将特别不能适应野外的物质迁到动物园或者植物园，种子库等等保护起来。

As with popular animals like elephants, pandas and tigers, or special kinds of plants, we can talk about ex-situ or in-situ conservation and debate on how to protect them. However in China, we don't even know what we have. How are the movements of our animals and plants changing? For example, in the Xishuangbanna area, will the changes in the movements of our animals and plants mean the extinction of some of these animals and plants within the next ten to twenty years? The degree of biological invasion from other species is still unclear, so what do we have to protect? So the key to this issue is to protect our existing protected areas, strengthen research of these movements, and we certainly should not move those organisms wich are suited to the wild to a zoo, botanical gardens or seed banks.

The comment was translated by Fang.Imogen.Liu

关键是要留给它们足够的生存空间，否则即使人类真的有能力搬动这些物种，也没有地方了。

The key is to leave enough living space. Otherwise, even if humans had the ability to relocate other species, there would not be any place left to relocate them.