Wind power could provide all of China's electricity, says a new study, if the country raises its subsidy and improves its grid. Ben Block reports.
“Extensive regions of northern and western China hold particularly large potential for wind energy, specifically the provinces of Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Gansu, and Tibet.”
Wind power alone could provide electricity for all of China if the country overhauls its rural grids and raises the subsidy for wind energy, a new study finds.
China has rapidly become a global leader in wind energy and now ranks fourth in the world in installed capacity. But coal-fired power plants continue to supply most of the country's rising electricity needs – a development path that scientists predict will lead to dangerous levels of climate change.
New models of China's wind resources suggest that coal is not the only cost-effective energy option for the country. The winds blowing in China are powerful enough to generate low-carbon electricity that eliminates "much, if not all" of the power sector's future greenhouse-gas emissions, according to researchers from Harvard University and Beijing's Tsinghua University.
“We are trying to cut into the current defined demand for new electricity generation in China, which is roughly a gigawatt (GW) a week – or an enormous 50 GW per year,” said Michael McElroy, lead author of the study published in the current issue of Science, in a statement. “China is bringing on several coal-fired power plants a week. By publicising the opportunity for a different way to go we will hope to have a positive influence.”
As China's demand for electricity increases an estimated 10% each year, the country is projected to need an additional 800 GW of coal-generated electricity during the next 20 years. With current wind energy payments of 0.4 yuan (US$0.059) per kilowatt-hour, wind energy could displace 23% of coal-generated electricity. If so, China would eliminate as much as 0.62 gigatonnes of annual carbon dioxide emissions, or 9.4% of the country's current annual emissions, the study said.
Wind energy could supply all of China's 2030 electricity demands, however, if wind contract prices were increased to 0.516 yuan (US$0.076) per kilowatt-hour, the study said.
“To determine the viability of wind-based energy for China, we established a location-based economic model, incorporating the bidding process, and calculated the energy cost based on geography,” said study co-author Xi Lu, a Harvard graduate student.
Rather than increase carbon dioxide emissions by 3.5 gigatonnes each year through 2030, as current policies would allow, the analysis determined that wind energy could replace 640 GW of coal-fired power. The switch would reduce emissions by 30% and require an investment of some 6 trillion yuan (US$900 billion).
“This is a large but not unreasonable investment, given the present size of the Chinese economy and the scale of the investments in both generating capacity and the grid infrastructure that will be required...to accommodate anticipated future growth in power demand," the authors wrote.
Extensive regions of northern and western China hold particularly large potential for wind energy, specifically the provinces of Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Gansu, and Tibet.
But the windiest areas are sparsely populated regions where electricity demands are low. High voltage transmissions lines are needed to connect these areas with electricity consumers in rapidly growing eastern China.
Meanwhile, existing wind farms are struggling to incorporate into the grid. Chinese law gives renewable power priority access to the grid, but a physical lack of grid capacity has limited wind energy's ability to reach customers, according to the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).
Still, wind farms are expanding rapidly across China. The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China's top economic planner, set a 2010 wind energy target of 5 GW, which the country surpassed in 2007.
Wind energy supplied 12.2 GW of installed capacity last year, about 0.4% of China's total electricity supply. China announced in May that more than 100 GW of wind energy capacity will be installed by 2020 and that renewable energy will supply 40% of the energy market by 2050.
The recent boost in wind production dates to the passage of a 2005 renewable energy law. The policy granted renewable energy providers with 10-year contracts and guaranteed subsidies. The NDRC clarified the renewable energy law in July by differentiating wind energy tariffs for various regions throughout the country.
In an effort to stimulate the domestic wind industry, the Chinese government also issued tax rebates last year for state-owned wind turbine manufacturers. Of the 70 Chinese manufacturers that produce wind turbines, more than 20 were formed last year, according to the GWEC.
Ben Block is a staff writer with the Worldwatch Institute. He can be reached at bblock@worldwatch.org.
This article is a product of Eye on Earth, Worldwatch Institute's online news service. For permission to reprint Eye on Earth content, please contact Juli Diamond at jdiamond@worldwatch.org.
Homepage image from Greenpeace
除非其他申明,本网站及其内容受知识共享组织的“署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎"2.0 英国:英格兰和威尔士协议和 2.5 中国大陆协议的保护。
Unless otherwise stated, this work is under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License and 2.5 China License.
参与讨论 COMMENTS
参与讨论
对风能的补贴有可能会促进对其的消费。这项措施比征收高额税收(对燃煤发电厂产出的能源征税)和关闭发电厂(有许多发电厂并没有遵循法律)更重要。如果想要避免灾难性的气候变化,二氧化碳的排放量必须以每年10%减少。的确,价格上升可能意味着经济增长放缓(世界并不需要这种情形),但至少地球还是适合所有人居住的,而不并仅仅是对于那些有钱人。
此评论由陈丽英翻译
Subisidies to wind (solar and hydro) power tend to increase consumption. It is far more important to charge a much greater tariff / tax on energy from coal-fired power stations - and close down power stations (and there are many) which are not complying with the law. Carbon emissions must be reduced (worldwide) at 10% annually if catastrophic climate change is to be avoided. Yes, increased prices might mean less economic growth (of the sort the world does not need), but at least the world remain habitable for all, not just the rich.
个人觉得还是有点不可思议。中国风能的成本和总量是否也支持这个结论呢?这个研究在可行性上是否有说明呢?
况且尽管“研究显示”,如果风电的合同价格达到每千瓦时0.516元(0.076美元),风能能够满足中国2030年全年的电力需求。但中国的计划是,到2050年可再生能量在能源市场中将占40%。
I still feel a bit amazed. Do the cost of wind power and the amount of it in China also support this conclusion? Is there any sign can show this conclusion practically from the research? Also, although it does say "Research shows" if the price of wind power can reach to ¥0.516 ($0.076) per KWh which means it will be enough for the whole year use in 2030 in China, what China has planned is to produce those renewable resources to be 40% in resource market in 2050.
Translated by Fan Yu.
Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated.
我们建议你在评论后署名, 以便其他浏览者能更好地与你交流。你没有必要使用真名,但你的署名将会协助我们维护网站的信息交流畅通。
We suggest you add your name to your comments so that other readers can respond to you more easily. You don’t have to use your real name, but providing a name will help make communication clearer for other forum participants.