参与讨论 COMMENTS
很多人都知道南水北调对环境的破坏,可是为什么这样的工程还在进行呢?就象三峡大坝一样,即使有专家学者反对还是建起来了.这样的错误和过去的大炼钢铁,农业学大寨有什么本质区别吗?我们在讪笑前辈们的愚昧的时候,是不是又在走他们的老路呢?
这些工程的建设有政治因素,经济因素,我的问题是:究竟用什么样的办法才可以阻止他们?国际社会的压力?公众意识的觉醒?
我们的公民做惯了顺民,给他点权利还真不习惯,要让他用起来就更难了.依靠人?政策?还是制度?答案在哪里?
Environment destroy has brought by South-to-North water transfer project of China, however, why this project is still in progress? For instance, the Three Gorges Dam has successfully built, although the project has been strongly opposed by specialist and scholar. Compare to steel making project and ‘Emulating Da-Zhai on Agriculture" Campaign in the past, does it show any differences in terms of intrinsic quality? If we deride the ignorant of our ancestor in the past, are we also following their path? The construction of these projects involves politic and economic factors, my question is: How do we actually can prevent them to proceed further? Is it the pressure from the international community? Awareness from the public? Our citizen used to comply with the whished from government, and don’t feel comfortable to grant them the right. In addition, for them to practice the right which has been granted, it could be difficult. Depend on others? Policy? Or system? Which is the answer?
发展模式是治理污染的根本,如果继续利用地区环境容量的发展模式,中国将有更多的地方受到污染.
The fundamental thing for pollution control is the development path we adopt. If we go on to develop at the price of local environmental capacity, China will have more polluted regions in the days to come.
我们建议你在评论后署名, 以便其他浏览者能更好地与你交流。你没有必要使用真名,但你的署名将会协助我们维护网站的信息交流畅通。
We suggest you add your name to your comments so that other readers can respond to you more easily. You don’t have to use your real name, but providing a name will help make communication clearer for other forum participants.
除非其他申明,本网站及其内容受知识共享组织的“署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎"2.0 英国:英格兰和威尔士协议和 2.5 中国大陆协议的保护。
Unless otherwise stated, this work is under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License and 2.5 China License.