参与讨论 COMMENTS
我认为这篇文章传达出了一种很重要的观点。如果中国人的生活水平想更上一层楼的话,那么全世界的资源都会耗尽。但是为什么他们过得要比西方人差呢?中国将挑战摆在了我们面前,我们应该更节俭,我们应该树立榜样。
I think there is a very important idea in this article. If Chinese people are to enjoy a better standard of living, we all know that the world's resources will run out. But why should they live any worse than people in the West? So frugality and conservation is a challenge that China offers to us in the West. We should lead the way..
我完全同意文章中的观点。延长建筑的实际有用寿命对于节约成本和消耗更少的资源是很重要的。但是,要在现代社会盈利,投资者可能比起长远的成本效率会更看重眼前的利益。人们可能不会因为节能就花更多的钱来购买此商品。而且也还有其它的因素来影响商品的消费。今天舒适时髦的公寓不一定被下一代接受。从根本上来说,我们不得不提倡更简单的生活方式。好的生活并不意味着是奢侈浪费的生活。
I totally agree with the point of view. in this article. It is very important to prolong the useful life of a building to make it more cost effective over the life of the build and consume less resources. However, to make money in modern society, one may have to focus on short term gains rather than long term cost effectiveness. People may not want to spend more money on something expensive just because it is energy efficient. Also, there are other factors that influence the consumption of the commodities. An apartment good for today in style and comfort may not be acceptable for future generations. Foundamentally, we may have to promote simple life styles. A good life doesn't mean a lavish life.
我们建议你在评论后署名, 以便其他浏览者能更好地与你交流。你没有必要使用真名,但你的署名将会协助我们维护网站的信息交流畅通。
We suggest you add your name to your comments so that other readers can respond to you more easily. You don’t have to use your real name, but providing a name will help make communication clearer for other forum participants.
除非其他申明,本网站及其内容受知识共享组织的“署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎"2.0 英国:英格兰和威尔士协议和 2.5 中国大陆协议的保护。
Unless otherwise stated, this work is under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License and 2.5 China License.