我不确定你是否有权在两方间做平衡比较，尽管他们在市场规模及其它方面的数据是相同的。事实是欧盟在实质上仍扮演统治的角色，而中国是一个真正的领导力量。这就是为什么在我看来你的言论并不是在做比较，而是在分裂欧盟各国。

I am not sure that you are allowed to make a balance between us both though the markets are the same size as many other data. In facts EU stay a virtual power of ruling while China is a true power of leading. That's why your contribution doesn't seem to me looking for comparisons but for divisions among europeans countries us.

这是一篇非常有建设意义的报道，我同意其中大部分的论证。只是还需指出一点，即：“低碳经济区”不仅应在中国建立，它也适用于整个欧洲。如果中国的低成本及巨大的市场能帮助降低低碳技术的成本，欧盟可自由支配收入更多、福利水平更高、社会经济体系更发达的国家能使低碳技术在转让过程中更好地抵御不确定因素和风险，这正如德国在率先应用可更新能源（太阳能和风能）时将成本分摊到各用户名上一样。中国和欧盟的领导人都需要展示他们应对气候变化的雄伟目标和决心，他们可以更紧密地合作，消除低碳技术及产品（正如我们所看到的在中国生产的节能灯和太阳能板）的转让障碍、提倡共同利益基础上的区域标准协定。王韬---廷道尔气候变化研究中心和苏塞克斯能源研究小组

This is a very constructive report and I agree with most of the arguments. Only one thing needs to be pointed out that “low-carbon economic zones” should not just be established in China alone, but in Europe as well. If the low manufacturing cost and huge market scale in China can help to lower cost of low carbon technologies, then higher disposable income and welfare level and more advanced social economic institutions in the EU make it more endurable to the uncertainty and risk during the low carbon transition, as we see Germany leading in deployment of renewables (solar and wind) through spread cost to all consumers. Both China and EU leaders need show their ambition and resolution in tackling climate change by closely working together to remove tariff barriers to trade of low carbon technology and goods (as we see in the cases of energy saving bulbs and PV panels made in China), barriers to low carbon technology transfer (e.g. clean coal technology), and promoting sectoral standards agreements on the ground of mutual benefits.

王韬 (Tao WANG)
Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research & Sussex Energy Group