人们总是善于去批评一件事物，而很少有人能提出具有建设性和可能性的建议．我觉得中国读者已经疲于看待批判的事物．没有可行性的建议，一切都是空谈．发达国家自身没有带好头，美国至今仍不愿加入议定书．我并不认为美国的态度在奥巴马上台后就会有任何实质意义上的飞跃．相反，美国会以自己的利益为中心，建立另一套国际能源环保的技术体制．他们要那环保技术赚钱，而并非为全人类的共同利益而做出协调性让步，甚至连义务也都不承担．

A deed is easy to get criticism but few constructive suggestions with feasibility. Chinese readers, in my view, has been tired of everything that gets only comment but nothing else. All is an empty talk without workable suggestion. The US still rejects the Kyoto Protocol to this day, and this shows that developed countries themselves take not a good lead. I don't think a substantial change in american attitude toward this will occur after Obama's coming into power. Instead, the US will install a technological system for international energy consumption and environmental protection that centers around its own interests. This set of technology is for money but not a concession corresponding with the common interests of the mankind as a whole. American might even shirk its due obligations.

Translated by Ming Li

你的分析很吸引人，但如果不把中国与波兰共同的、以煤为能源的生产体系考虑进去的话，其成功的可能性看来渺渺！发达国家会拿出其1%的GNP以清理产煤或烧煤发电的事宜，这个假设心太高。每一步包含了甲烷的清理过程，在妥当及彻底的完成后，电价将是几何？

本评论由Ming Li翻译

Your analysis is very interesting but seems to have a very low chance of success if you don't take any account of the common structure of energy production of both China and Poland, which is coal! It is very ambitious to presume that developed countries will accept 1% of their GNP to clean the coal, or clean the burning of coal for electricity. What will be the price of the electricity after a thorough and complete cleaning at each step of the process involving the methane itself?