In the second part of a series on chinadialogue, Ian Harvey says intellectual property rights will provide a catalyst for the deployment of low-carbon technologies.
参与讨论 COMMENTS
专利制度能促进观念和技术的传播,同时,也能保证相应的发明家有权决定专利如何被使用。我同意,我们需要强制政策鼓励绿色技术的投资、研究和推广。然而,制定并维护这些政策将需要环保意识和政治意愿的一致。
本评论由Yuexia.Guo翻译。
Patents can encourage the dissemination of ideas and technologies then, at the same time as ensuring that deserved inventors have the say on how the patent will be used. I agree, we need strong policies that will encourage investment, research and dissemination of green technologies. Getting these policies and maintaining them though, will require environmentally conscious and concerted political will.
中国与印度提出,技术转让是达成哥本哈根协议的一个障碍,但真正的问题是在此吗?一直以来,我们获悉中国在太阳能与风能技术上领先,中国政府也正投资于多个低碳技术。因此,在寻求技术方面中国确切想要的是什么?是否已和西方一样,这不再是个部署配置上的问题?如同1楼所说的,这是缺乏政治意愿的问题。坚持技术转让主张,却又阐述不细,这已开始看起来象个谈判中使用的拖延战术。
本评论由Ming Li翻译
China and India raise technology transfer as an obstacle to reaching an agreement in Copenhagen. But is this a real problem? We are always being told that China is a leader in solar and wind technologies and the Chinese government is investing in many low carbon technologies. So what exactly is it that the Chinese need in the way of technologies? Is it not more a question of deployment, as it is in the West? It is political will, as the first comment says that is lacking -- and the insistence on technology transfer, without the details, is beginning to look like a delaying tactic in the negotiations.
这篇文章的作者连一点反对的观点也没有提及,而实际上反对的观点并不少。毫无疑问,保护知识产权可获益,可就全球看来,知识产权在环保方面的影响,更多是负面的。举个例, 想想跨国公司孟山都(Monsanto)是怎么以知识产权为武器,在世界范围上对付小农户的吧。孟山都通过给种子获取专利权及收购其它种子公司的手段,逼着小农户不得不从它那买种子,要不然就得从别的地方花更高的价钱买种子。这一手段正在世界上摧毁着小农户,也摧毁着对全球环境至关紧要的可持续农业发展体系。我们已有解决当前环境问题的技术方案,只是还需要执行这些方案的政治意愿与决心。从人民手中夺走更多的力量却将之交与公司,只会让我们与有持续发展能力的地球渐行渐远。
本评论由Ming Li翻译
The author of this article makes no reference to any opposing points of view, when in fact there are many. While there are no doubt benefits to protecting IPR, in the context of the global environment IPR seem to have a more negative effect. Consider for example how the multinational corporation Monsanto is using IPR as a weapon against small farmers around the world. By patenting seeds and buying up other seed companies, Monsanto forces small farmers to have to buy seeds from their company or pay much higher prices to buy them anywhere else. This is destroying many small farmers around the world and the sustainable agriculture systems which are of crucial importance to the global environment. We already have the technology to solve our current environmental problems, we just need the political will and resolve to implement the solutions. Taking more power away from the people and putting it into corporate hands will only bring us further away from global sustainability.
我们建议你在评论后署名, 以便其他浏览者能更好地与你交流。你没有必要使用真名,但你的署名将会协助我们维护网站的信息交流畅通。
We suggest you add your name to your comments so that other readers can respond to you more easily. You don’t have to use your real name, but providing a name will help make communication clearer for other forum participants.
除非其他申明,本网站及其内容受知识共享组织的“署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎"2.0 英国:英格兰和威尔士协议和 2.5 中国大陆协议的保护。
Unless otherwise stated, this work is under Creative Commons' Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 England & Wales License and 2.5 China License.