我完全同意作者的观点。而且，我看着文章想起了在北京老胡同卖煤球的人，冬天的时候他们一边骑自行车一边卖煤炭。政府破坏胡同和这种生活方式的一个借口就是老房子用煤炭，郊区的新房子用比较干净的能源。这些人和他们的生活方式应不应该这样被威胁？

I definitely agree with the author's point of view. On the other hand, the image came into my mind of the sellers of coal bricks peddling through the old hutong of Beijing, selling their coal in winter. One excuse of the government's in destroying those streets, and that way of life, is that the old houses burn coal, but the new high-rises in the suburbs where people are moved will have cleaner energy. Should these people and their ways of life be targeted like this?

很好，有独到的见解！！

Mary Jay

Wonderful, insightful article!!

Mary Jay

很高兴能看到一篇强调能源效率而不是单纯说中国要降低排放的文章。中国每单位GDP的能耗是美国的四倍，解决能源使用效率问题比减少整体排放更实际些。
Katie

It's good to see an article that focuses on energy efficiency rather than China's need to simply cut emissions. Per unit of GDP, China uses four times more energy than the United States. Addressing issues like this will be much easier than reducing overall emissions.
Katie

我完全同意Aturen的观点还有他对污染的诠释。但是问题是怎么样去做！有什么好的办法么？

Snow brown bear

Totally agree with Aturen and his defination of pollution, but the problem is how! any good solution?

Snowland brown bear

很不错，我喜欢。

Very nice. I like this.