所谓的“天人合一”的理念，并不是主流的传统文化。中国古代社会照样竭尽所能地开发自然资源，即使当时力量弱小，依然造成了大量的林地退化问题。
我深刻地怀疑，这些声称“中国文化拯救地球”的人，他的目的到底是拯救地球还是为了弘扬传统文化。这样的主张在现在的西方社会确实可能有很大的市场，但是，如果中国一直拒绝一些现在被广泛接受的“普世的价值”，反而把一些自己都搞不太清楚的价值冠以“普世价值”进行推广，真的会有效果吗？

The concept of the so-called "harmony between heaven and man" is not the mainstream traditional culture. In ancient China, people also did their utmost to tap natural resources, though with less power, causing much forestry degradation. I'm sceptical about those who claim that "Chinese culture saves the earth". What is their real purpose? Are they aiming to save the earth or simply to popularize traditional culture? Such a claim presumably has a large market in modern western society. However, if China keeps resisting widely acknowledged and accepted "universal values" and instead popularizes a vague set of principles as "universal values", will it be really effective?

也许有更多的多边进程与联合国展开竞争反而对这个庞大臃肿官僚的机构更加有益。

Presumably more multilateral processes compete with the UN will instead bring more benefits to this unwieldy and overstaffed bureaucratic organization.

几个建议给Shuibo:
写反驳文章一定要冷静，《教父》里面说：“千万不要恨你的敌人，这会让你丧失判断力”。
写反驳文章一定要针对对方论据使用己方论据展开反驳，直接扣帽子的做法已经过时了。

some suggestions for shuibo:
calm down before you refute it. Here is a quote in God Father :" Never hate your enemies -- it disturbs your judgment."
You need to present evidence to refute your opponent. The method of slapping labels is outdated.

我就是作者。这篇文章没有什么特别的用意，只是想借鉴一些国外讨论的资料，来推动中国关于核能的讨论。正因为十二五规划如此之重要，所以决策更需要广泛的讨论，听取各方的意见。所有的决策都是权衡利弊的结果，这片本章的内容充其量只是给天平的一侧增加几个砝码而已。
说白了，最核心的问题还不是要不要核能，而是能源政策的制定是否透明，公开，并有广泛的公众的讨论和参与？

I'm the author himself, I didn't write it in some particular purpose but to provoke discussion on nuclear power in china from abroad experience. Just because the Twelfth Five Year Plan is so important that broader debates and distinct opinions are needed. All decisions are resulted from interest balancing, this article is only adding weight to one side.Frankly speaking, the core problem is not whether we should develope nuclear power, but whether the energy policy is made in a transparent and open way with broad public discussion and participation.

2010年，日本公布的能源计划表明，日本将在2030年之前新建14个核反应堆，把核电在全国能源供应中的比例从30%提升到50%。

　　但菅直人10日在新闻发布会上说，福岛第一核电站震后发生爆炸和核泄漏后，日本的长期能源计划要“从新开始”。他介绍说，核能和化石燃料一直是日本能源政策两个支柱，现在应该增加两种：包括太阳能、风能在内的可再生能源，以及能源节约型的社会。

http://www.in-en.com/article/html/energy_09170917621009924.html

Japan is to build 14 nuclear reactors before 2030, raising nuclear power‘s share in the national energy supply from 30% to 50% according to Japan's newly-published energy plan in 2010.
However, Nanto Kan's claim in the news release on May 10 said that Japan's long-term energy plan would have to restart after the earthquake-triggered meltdown and nuclear leak in the Fukushima Nuclear Plant, adding that nuclear power and fossil fuel had always been two crucial parts in the Japanese energy policies, to which two more parts should be added now: renewable resources including solar energy and wind energy should be developed and an energy-conserving society should be pursued.
http://www.in-en.com/article/html/energy_09170917621009924.html