文章 Articles

The wrong direction west

Beijing has renewed its efforts to drive development in western China but, amid the fanfare, environmental risks are being ignored, write Dong Zhenguo and Zhang Guilin.

Article image

Last year, Beijing boosted its decade-long campaign to develop the economically backward regions of western China by launching a fresh development drive. But on a research trip to Sichuan, Guangxi, Chongqing and other parts of China’s west, Outlook Weekly found that old problems continue to restrict progress. Poor transportation, out-dated industrial structure, environmental protection failures – these issues are still very real in western China.

As well as human history, geography has played its part in stifling economic development in this part of the country. Unlike China’s eastern fringes, the west lacks easy access to the sea. When trying to attract investment, the city of Chongqing finds that exporters prefer to build factories on the coast in order to avoid the extra costs associated with several thousand kilometres of overland transport, particularly when their business involves moving bulky, low-tech products.

The drive to develop the west has, as a result, included efforts to improve access to the sea. Guangxi, the only south-western province with a coastline, is currently working on the “Pan-Beibu Gulf Economic Cooperation”, a scheme to boost trade and logistics capacity in the South China Sea, as well as construction of the Xi River’s Golden Waterway, an engineering project to massively increase the handling capacity of the river port.

Sichuan, meanwhile, is set on becoming a transportation hub for the entire south-west, with work underway on rail routes in all directions out of the province. And Yunnan will strive over the next 10 years to become a bridgehead in China’s dealings with its south-western neighbours.

But these ambitions are hampered by stumbling blocks. Guangxi’s Beibu Gulf port has expanded rapidly, but the actual quantity of goods passing through is still low. In theory, Guangxi should be a better option than Guangdong or Shanghai for companies exporting from the south-west, but the longer route is still more popular. The majority of firms in Chongqing and Sichuan still choose to export their goods via Shanghai, taking advantage of low transportation costs on the Yangtze River.

Moreover, industry in China’s south-west still centres around oil, gas, coal, ferrous metals and hydropower – essentially energy and raw materials. Heavy industries have been expanding rapidly and, in recent years, the industrial structure has even started to show a reverse slide: the proportion of extractive and resource-intensive industries in overall output has been steadily increasing. Little processing – or actual use – of materials takes place here and it is increasingly clear that low-end industries are expanding. GDP figures for western China show that, in 2007, high-tech industry accounted for only 5.6% of the output of large-scale industry in that region. This was 3 percentage points down on 2000 and 7.8 percentage points lower than in eastern China.

Pu Yongjian, a professor at Chongqing University, explained: “If the west of China just relies on resource extraction and processing, while ignoring more environmentally friendly sectors such as tourism and culture, we will struggle to create a diversified development path.” The west is set to embark on a new round of resource extraction and, as this peaks, the worsening of the region’s industrial structure will accelerate, with the potential to wreak serious environmental damage.

So-called “new industries” also pose environmental dangers, however. Western regions are competing to attract the high-tech and capital-intensive enterprises relocating from the east coast, for example those producing electronic components, solar-power products and even chemicals. But the environmental risks are not being acknowledged. Even some ecologically sensitive areas are lowering environmental standards in order to open up space for new industries.

Take polysilicon, a material used in the manufacturing of solar cells, as an example. Sichuan is currently developing the “Chengdu–Leshan–Mianyang Polysilicon Industrial Zone”, to boost the region’s capacity to produce the material. Leshan can currently produce 7,500 tonnes of polysilicon a year and, by 2013, is expected to earn 100 million yuan (US$15 million) annually from the sale and use of 10,000 tonnes of polysilicon.

Local investment authorities take pride in attracting these “new industries”, but they frequently ignore the environmental risks that come with them. Polysilicon production is energy-intensive and polluting. Producing one megawatt of solar-cell capacity requires 2.2 million kilowatt hours of electricity and creates eight times the product’s weight in the by-product silicon tetrachloride – a toxic liquid. Due to high costs, Chinese firms have no, or inadequate, equipment to deal with this pollutant, meaning it can easily find its way into the environment.  

In recent years, a lot of electronics manufacturing has also moved to the west of China. Currently, the IT sectors in Sichuan, Chongqing and Xi’an – the capital of Shaanxi province – each have an output of over 100 billion yuan (US$15 billion), with component manufacturing accounting for the bulk of this. Sichuan’s city of Suining has alone attracted almost 100 electrical component and circuit-board manufacturers over the past few years, leading to the creation of a 2.7-square kilometre electronics park. But the local government has shown little concern about the environmental practices of these firms.

The environmental dangers associated with the major chemical projects that these regions are competing to host are also being overlooked. In April last year, China National Petroleum Corporation started construction of an 800,000-tonne ethylene plant and a 10-million tonne oil refinery at Pengzhou on the banks of the Tuo River, a Yangtze tributary. The site is upwind and upstream of Chengdu, a major city just 39 kilometres away, and only five kilometres from urban Pengzhou.

And, in Chongqing’s Changshou district, German firm BASF is preparing build the world’s largest Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate(MDI) plant – a new, and controversial, neighbour for the ecologically sensitive Three Gorges Reservoir.  


This article was originally published by Outlook Weekly, where Dong Zhenguo and Zhang Guilin are reporters.

Homepage image from Ling Shen

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default thumb avatar
cdhelennh

一条改进建议

这篇中文报道的hyperlinks“西部大开发”和“新一轮”都链接到英文的source去了,而且“新一轮”还是一个收费的资讯网站。我认为中外对话应该作以下改进:
1、根据语种不同,适当tailor一下hyperlinks指向的内容,以便让引用的references更利于读者使用。
2、今后不宜把reference指向信息量非常有限除非要收费的网站,这难免有替人打广告之嫌。
谢谢!

Recommendation for improvements

Hyperlinks for "western development" and "new round" in the Chinese version link to English-language sources, and "new round" goes to an informational site that requires a fee. I think chinadialogue should make the following improvements:
1. According to the different languages, appropriate hyperlinks should be tailored to the content so readers can get the most out of references.
2. In the future, don’t make reference to a very limited amount of information on a site with a fee, since it’s difficult for readers to avoid bothersome advertisements. Thank you!

Default thumb avatar
cdhelennh

几点看法

1、“新一轮”西部大开发的开展,有没有基于对“上一轮”西部大开发的成果、问题及应对方法等的科学评估,公众不知道。
2、“上一轮”西部大开发本来就有很多学者指出来是以资源开发为主(如西气东输)的,连大量基础设施建设的投资也是为了使资源更便利地运到东部等发达地区。那么,新一轮的开发是不是还是以资源输出为主,没有一个基本定调。
3、文中提到“中石油四川石化80万吨乙烯、1000万吨炼油项目在四川沱江边的彭州上马”,这个项目导致09年大量成都市民上街“散步”,反对声音四起,但项目仍然环评过关,决策的公众参与缺失,说明过去的“大开发”十年中,政府让公众参与决策的意识没有得到开发(至少没有学习厦门)。

Some views

1. No one knows whether forging a "new round" of major Western development will be based on a scientific assessment of accomplishments, problems, and coping methods from the “last round” of western development.
2. According to many scholars, the “last round” of significant Western development was principally based on resource development (like transporting natural gas from the West to the East), even as a great deal of investment in infrastructure also made resources more easily transportable to developed regions in the East. So will a new round of development still be primarily based on exporting resources, and without a fundamental element.
3. The article mentions “China National Petroleum Corporation started construction of an 800,000-tonne ethylene plant and a 10-million tonne oil refinery at Pengzhou on the banks of the Tuo River.” The project drove a large number of people to take to the streets of Chengdu in 2009 to "walk." Opposition was widespread, but the project still received Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) clearance. The lack of public participation in the decision-making showed that, for "major development" over the past decade, the government’s level of awareness in allowing the public to take part in decision-making hasn’t progressed (at least not in terms of learning from what happened in Xiamen).

Default thumb avatar
cdhelennh

新问题

第一,除了“制约西部发展的老问题,如交通障碍、产业结构和聚集度、生态环境保护等”,还有东部污染企业向中西部转移的新问题(如中西部频频出现的血铅事件),如何在“新一轮”开发中避免,这是一个挑战。 西部地区到东部招商引资来了一些环境、健康灾难,必须要及时总结。
第二、大开发过去的十年,东西部的差距实际是拉大了,贫富差距是增加了。这个问题怎么解决?生态补偿是一个解决途径,但制度上没有安排。在新一轮开发中,如何减少差距,如何可持续利用西部资源,不能只鼓励开发,不讲节制,更不能只图短期的(又一个十年)开发成果,不谈长期的规范。

New problems

Firstly, in addition to the old problems that are restricting progress in western China - "poor transportation, out-dated industrial structure, and environmental protection failures" - issues also arise with the transfer of polluting industries from east to west (as the frequent cases of elevated blood lead levels in central-western China show).The challenge is to avoid such problems in the "new round" of development. The environmental and health problems that have been brought west with capital and commerce must be solved in a timely manner.
Secondly, in the large scale development of the last ten years, the gap between east and west China has actually widened, as has the gap between rich and poor. How can this problem be solved? Ecological compensation is one way, but there is no support for this in the system. In the new round of development, thought must be given to how to narrow these gaps and sustainably use western China's resources. It should not encourage unrestrained development or aim for short term results (i.e. within a decade) without discussing a long term model.