文章 Articles

China under intense pressure to relax waste ban

Imports of foreign plastic could fall by as much as 80% next year, Catherine Early reports

Article image

Waste companies are increasingly unwilling to risk exporting waste to China (Image: Greenpeace)

Some are stockpiling it, some are sending it to landfill, some are finding other countries to take it. Scrap plastics, paper and other materials are piling up at scrapyards and ports after the surprise announcement by China to severely restrict imports of scrap as waste companies struggle to deal with the unprecedented situation.

The industry was unprepared for the Chinese government’s sudden announcement in July of a complete ban on imports of mixed, unsorted paper, and a restriction on the maximum weight of contaminated waste to 0.3% of the total contained in the shipment. The government said it needed to protect its environment from “dirty or even hazardous waste” sometimes found in shipments.

Following intense lobbying efforts from the waste industry, it has since relaxed these thresholds slightly and says it will accept contamination levels of 0.5% for paper and plastics, but nevertheless, the standards are so hard to meet that some have called it a de facto ban. Countries have until 15 December to make representations to the World Trade Organization (WTO), but China has already said that it will adopt the rules as of 31 December, with entry into force scheduled for 1 March 2018.

China’s demands are higher than international standards on contamination in recycling, said Adina Renee Adler, senior director of government relations and international affairs at the US-based Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI).

“There are approved levels of contamination allowed because they [the international recycling industry] understand that the technology available today can meet those standards,” she says.

The world is heavily dependent on sending its waste to China, which last year imported more than 36% of the world’s waste paper, and with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, more than 70% of the world’s waste plastics, according to UN Comtrade data. Trade in these commodities is worth US$17 billion and US$4.6 billion, respectively. European countries and the US are the main exporters.

New rules lack clarity

Adler says that the announcement has already caused major changes in the global trade of scrap materials. Waste companies have been unwilling to risk continuing exports to China because if shipments are rejected they will be liable for return shipping costs.

Companies are uncertain of the detail of the new rules and customs officials have interpreted them inconsistently, she says. In one case, a member of ISRI had a shipment rejected because it did not meet the proposed rules even though it was compliant with existing ones, she reports.

Arnaud Brunet, director general of the Brussels-based Bureau of International Recycling (BIR), predicts exports of scrap paper to China will decline by 40% next year, and plastics by 80%. “The thresholds for impurities are not feasible, they are so low that it is a de-facto ban,” he says.

Transition plea

BIR wants the Chinese government to revise the thresholds. It is also calling for a transition period of up to five years, along with several countries, including the US, Canada, Australia, Korea and the EU. “If we don’t want the collapse of the market we need a transition period,” he says.

A transition would also benefit Chinese manufacturers, which are reliant on the imports of scrap material to reprocess into products. BIR counts several Chinese manufacturers and waste trade bodies in its membership and they are very concerned, Brunet report.

Adler agrees with the idea of a transition period. Besides, under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, any country changing regulations is required to allow a transition period, she says. Not only has China not proposed one, it has only given one month for consultation instead of the usual six, she says.

ISRI supports the Chinese government’s drive to reduce contaminated waste entering the country, Adler says, but adds: “This should not be at the expense of rejecting these high value commodities that are actually in high demand by their own manufacturing sector, which is the backbone of their industry.”

Prices of certain types of scrap in China have already risen alongside the slowdown in imports, she says.

In the EU, the commission has noted the Chinese government’s moves and says it is in touch with its authorities to clarify the exact timing and scope of the measures so that it can properly assess their impact. The commission backed China’s desire to protect its environment and was ready to cooperate with it to achieve this within WTO rules, a spokesperson said.

The commission wants all plastic packaging in the EU market to be recyclable by 2030, and is planning to publish a strategy in the new year. This will take into account international issues such as the Chinese import ban once details have been clarified, according to the spokesperson.

The circular economy strategy is unlikely to be finalised before the UK leaves the EU, but UK trade bodies are calling on the government to adopt the strategy despite Brexit, and apply new regulations on packaging design to help industries deal with China’s new rules.

However, environment secretary Michael Gove admitted in an evidence session in Parliament that he did not know what impact the Chinese import restrictions had for UK businesses, and had not given it “sufficient thought”.

Alternative markets sought

Companies are already exploring other potential markets for recyclate with possibilities including Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Malaysia and also India and Pakistan. “They have positioned themselves in the market but they certainly don’t have the same capacity as China,” says Brunet.

He adds that the regulations and legal systems on waste management in these countries are not as mature as they are in China, but that they could quickly catch up.

Analysts at PCI Wood Mackenzie believe that South East Asia could become a world leader in importing and processing plastic waste. In a report published in September, the analysts state: “This region has traditionally been the single largest source of [polyethylene terephthalate, or PET] waste imports into China and is now in the position to develop its reclamation capacity and secondary markets further.”

Phil Marshall, head of PET at the firm, said that some Chinese manufacturers were already considering moving their operations to other parts of Asia. Reprocessing plants are relatively easy to set up, so this could take place in other countries and then be imported into China for use by their manufacturers, he believes.

A more circular economy

In the longer-term, China’s move could catalyse work on the circular economy, keeping resources in use for as long as possible. Ben Dixon, an associate specialising in the circular economy at consultants Systemiq, says that China’s move is forcing countries and companies to find alternatives for their waste at the same time as several other developments globally are increasing the demand for high-quality recycled materials. 

Firstly, companies are collaborating on projects across the plastics value chain through the Ellen Macarthur Foundation’s New Plastics Economy, boosting the sector’s ability to quickly scale up improvements. In October, the foundation announced pledges by Mars, M&S, PepsiCo, the Coca-Cola Company, Unilever and Werner and Mertz to increase the recyclability and recycled content of their packaging.

Added to this are improvements in reprocessing technology and approaches to recycling, including better waste sorting, cleaning and de-odorising methods that reduce contamination, and packaging designers using mono-materials rather than multiple layers of different materials, which are hard to recycle. On top of this, the European Commission is leading activity through development of its circular economy package, he says.

“It’s a really interesting time if you add up all the changes together. It’s potentially a watershed moment for the recycling industry,” he says.

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

發達國家對後發展國家的垃圾出口

垃圾出口根本就是發達國家當後發展國家為垃圾收集箱,讓自己可以肆意製造垃圾。中國相對其他後發展國家比較發達,就不再做人家的垃圾收集箱,是絕對正常亦無可非議的。與其指責中國提高垃圾進口的標準,產生巨量垃圾的發達國家應自我檢討如何去接受後發展國家終有一天站起來,反抗做垃圾收集箱的現實。先進國家不能將環境損壞的責任作轉稼,減少廢物與污染才是可持續的發展。

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

香港的廢物回收狀況

香港雖然大量回收全球廢料,僅2%在本港循環再造,其餘均轉賣回大陸。而不道德的回收業界輸往大陸的廢料可循環再造率更越來越低,內地甚至嘗試拒絕回收香港廢紙,很明顯回收商是打著環保的旗幟賺保貼。由於大陸對香港特區政策的傾斜,百般討好港人,以經濟手段賺取民心,香港普遍認為今次大陸拒收洋垃圾是讓香港可以向內地轉口更多劣質廢料。大陸與香港簽成立了自貿區,理論上是可以給香港更多優惠,這其實絕對不智,因外國垃圾仍然可以經香港再轉售大陸,就是提高了內地回收業的成本。內地要用更高的價錢入口連香港都不能循環再用的廢料有何用處?中國之大不能以滿足小小一個經濟特區而損害內地的回收事業。中國的回收事業就是世界的回收事業,也影響世界可持續發展事業。