文章 Articles

Why China should move the capital

Beijing, China’s water-poor and overpopulated capital, is stretching its resources to the limit. It is time for a new strategy, writes Mei Xinyu, the country should seriously consider moving its capital.

Article image

If you are asking whether you read that correctly, then yes. China really should consider moving the capital away from Beijing. Any nation, particularly a major power, should choose a location for its capital that allows growth and can respond to challenges. The historical advantages that led Beijing to become China’s capital no longer exist, and the location’s disadvantages are becoming ever more apparent. If Beijing remains the capital it will not only be a burden on the rest of the nation, the city itself will be led down a dead end.

The Yan Kingdom may have chosen the area for its capital 2,000 years ago, but Beijing was never at the heart of Chinese civilisation. Its history as the capital of unified China stems from the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. Modern China, however, cannot remain wedded an old-fashioned perspective that uses a stronghold in the north for the plunder of the south.

With the rise of the Ming Dynasty in the fourteenth century, the Mongols retreated back north, but they hoped to return and were regarded as a major threat to the Ming. Zhu Yuanzhang, the founder and first emperor of the Ming Dynasty, was concerned about these enemies over the border and warned the military should stay ready for action. Therefore, the Ming maintained a strong army, but with the capital in the southern city of Nanjing they faced a dilemma. If their generals were given a free hand, could they be trusted to deal with threats over the border? If they kept the army on too tight a leash, would they lose the ability to act decisively and risk repeating the military disasters of the Song Dynasty? The Ming decided to move the capital north, even at the risk of putting the lives of the court on the line. In the twentieth century, choosing Beijing as the capital of the People’s Republic of China may have kept the government closer to its friends at the time, a similar fighting spirit was seen when Soviet armies massed on China’s northern borders.

Today, none of those reasons remain for keeping Beijing as the capital. Modern communications and transportation mean there is no need for today’s “emperors” to stay within easy reach of the borders. Ever since the Opium Wars, China’s military threats have come from the east, not the north. The Mongols were pacified, the Soviet Union collapsed and we are on friendly terms with Russia. Keeping the capital in Beijing does not keep us closer to our allies.  

Retaining Beijing as the capital continues to present problems. A city of 20 million people located in such a water-poor area raises concerns. Should the authorities not consider the capacity of the environment? Can we really afford the cost of locating the capital in Beijing? Are we already damaging the balanced growth of the nation?

Quenching Beijing’s thirst has already meant tapping the Hai River and water from neighbouring provinces. Now the Han River is to be diverted for a huge project transferring water from the south to the north. The impact of this project on the lower reaches of the Han River should not be underestimated. It will not necessarily solve water problems in the north, but it may well destroy the environment in the south. Beijing may have moved the Shougang steel plant for the sake of its air quality, but it continues to develop water-intensive industry. Why not move the industry and resources where there is more water?

As for Beijing itself, the city’s excessive population growth and expanding industry degrades the quality of life. Overpopulation means too many cars; the city’s congestion is the stuff of nightmares. Environmental pollution and over-priced property add to the problem. Even if the government keeps the price of water low for the sake of residents on low incomes, the cost of bringing that water to Beijing remains. The water could in fact provide greater economic and environmental benefit elsewhere.

If Beijing remains the capital, then damage to the environment and quality of life could spread irreversibly to other areas. The centre of power in any country will gather resources towards itself and that will attract people from elsewhere – at home and abroad – to come seek their fortunes. They have every right to do so, and this should not be restricted, but inevitably the pressures on the city are increased. At China’s recent seventeenth Communist Party congress, president Hu Jintao discussed the promotion of coordinated regional development and optimising the development of land. Leaving Beijing as the capital may be the biggest possible mistake.

If China faced a military threat from the north, or Beijing only had 3 or 4 million people, there would be no need to move the capital. However, in the current circumstances, we should give it serious consideration. In the long-term it will solve the wider problems I have mentioned, but in the short- and medium-term it will also provide a new focus for economic growth after the Olympic Games.

If China were to select a new capital, the ideal location would be a small- or medium-sized city, with undeveloped land for construction, around the lower and middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Such a geographic location would have high environmental capacity and land for government buildings – unlike an already developed city. Finally, a smaller population would mean local interests could not hold central government to ransom – and it would also be easier to spread Mandarin as the official language.

This article first appeared on FTChinese.com

Homepage photo by Zalzadore

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

北京垃圾场

别啊,迁哪哪倒霉,还不如留那呢?再过个百十年,直接到坝上立块牌子,上书五个大字:北京垃圾场!下写一行小字:世界第一的垃圾场。后面加一括弧,就写:内有世界文化遗产故宫和世界建筑遗产CBD,挖掘小心。

Beijing will become a rubblish dump in future!

Moving China's Capital elsewhere will bring similar disaster to the new location.

It is possible that Beijing will become a world rubbish dump in about 100 years, though it still houses the world heritage Forbidden City.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

迁都现实么?

个人觉得迁都未必是一个好办法。到是分散北京的功能是一个值得考虑的办法。现在北京集政治经济文化中心于一身使得城市发展负担过重。应该把北京作为单纯的争执中引来发展,将经济功能方分散到周围城市,如天津和河北的一些周边城市。

Is moving the Capital practical?

Personally, I don't think moving the capital from Beijing elsewhere is a good idea.

However, decentralizing Beijing's functions might work. As China's political, economic and cultural center, Beijing is overburden with an overall development in these areas.

It is suggested that surrounding cities, like Tianjin and those in Hebei Province, can help ease Beijing's pressures in economic growth.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

迁都解决问题?

迁都解决了北京的问题,但谁又能保证不造成新首都出现同样的问题?

Can the resettlement of the Capital be helpful?

Problems in Beijing might be solved after the Chinese Capital is moved elsewere. However, how can we guarantee that similar problems won't occure in the new Capital?

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

这么眼熟的文章!

这文章在FT中文网2007年11月9日不是发表过了吗??
怎么又来了??引发的评论很多了呀?

Very familiar article!

Was this piece been published on the FT on Nov. 9 2007? See here:

So why is it republished again? Also the piece has invited many commments already on the FT.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

花费

迁都所需要的补助将会是巨大的,因为这涉及到成千上万的居民需要迁往到新都以及众多的国内外公司需要在新都重新建立自己的总部。并且被选来当新都的城市也不乐于接受新的老板和员工从而使当地的老板们丧失权力。

the expense

The cost of moving would be huge as massive subsidies would be needed for the tens of millions of residents and demanded by so many domestic and foreign companies as they would need and want to relocate their head offices to the new capital.

Also, the city chosen as the capital might not be so happy to receive the emporer and staff because that means a loss of power for local bosses.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

有关FT中文网的问题

是的,这篇文章最初是在FT中文网上发表过,你也可以在这篇文章末尾的注明上看到。FT中文网的编辑会定期的发表一些对他们的读者感兴趣的中外对话的文章。中外对话也会偶尔发表一些感兴趣的FT中文网上的文章,这些文章可能是我们读者没有看到过的。----中外对话总编:Isabel Hilton

ft question

Yes this piece was published originally on ftchinese.co, as is clearly stated at the bottom of the article. ftchinese.com regularly publishes chinadialogue material that its editors consider of interest to its readers. chinadialogue occasionally publishes ftchinese.com material that is of interest and that our readers may not have seen.
isabel hilton, editor, chinadialogue

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

仅仅靠迁都并不是一个好的解决办法

现在中国存在更多更重要需要考虑的问题。很长一段时间以来,北京已经集聚了作为首都的所有功能,而现在迁都无疑将耗资巨大且没有价值。我的建议是将工业以及工厂搬迁出去,使北京成为一个仅是首都的特殊城市。张

It is not a good solution just by moving the capital

Nowerdays there are many more important things than considering this problem for China .And for such a long time ,Beijing has gathered all the functions as a capital,the expense of moving it is very huge and useless.
My opinion is moving out the factories and industries ,leave Beijing a special city as the capital. Zhang

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

污染转移

应该是减少人口,减少排放,减少污染......Mo

transfer pollution

We should try to control population, reduce green-house gas emission, fight pollution...

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

欢迎迁都

迁都涉及到了集体和个人方方面面的利益,但是只要迁了,再大的问题也会随着时间的流逝而得到解决.新中国需要一个更具更现代化的的首都来更好地代表它的形象。

Support removing capital

It is for sure that moving the capital will have an impact on the interests of individuals and collectives and thus bring in issues of all sorts.

However, big all these problems are, they can be solved as time goes by.

A much more modern capital is called on for the new China to better present its image.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

北京将会发生什么情况?

在中国迁都建议中,有人提议迁移到一个小城市,这样政客们就不会被地方利益所钳制。另外,还有人把北京污染和水源缺乏作为迁都的动力和理由。

那么,迁都将意味大量人口的迁移吗? 如果不是的话, 环境问题不会得到解决。环境问题将被留给这些留在北京的人来解决。如果如此的话,这将回到这篇文章提到的迁都的理由,除了水资源因素外。

有一些迁都的积极因素,但迁都看起来不会解决北京目前面临的很多问题,所以,迁都后,这些问题还是继续存在。  Jonathan

What will happen to Beijing?

In suggesting that the capital move, the argued call for a small city so that politicians could not be held ransom by local interests. Elsewhere it argued that pollution and scarce water resources are motivations for moving. So is there going to be a massive move of people to the new capital or not? If not, the environmental problems won't fixed, they'll just be left behind by the government for those left in Beijing to deal with. If so, then this will invite the same problems that the article cites as reasons to move (with perhaps the exception of low water resources). There could be some positive elements to moving the capital, but it doesn't seem to address many of the issues that Beijing currently faces and will continue to face.
-Jonathan