文章 Articles

The high price of developing dams

The new economic stimulus is encouraging hydropower development in southwest China, raising fears about the ecological and social costs. Jiang Gaoming reports.

Article image

The Chinese government’s recently disclosed 4-trillion-yuan (US$585 billion) economic stimulus package has revived interest in hydropower projects in the country’s southwest. Yunnan province and Sichuan province have accelerated work on projects that were already planned or under construction. On a recent reporting trip to Yunnan, I saw that in some cases this has meant building work starting before any kind of environmental impact assessment (EIA) has been conducted.

At the Guanyinyan dam, in Huaping county, and Ludila dam, in Bingchuan county, construction vehicles speed back and forth amid clouds of dust. EIAs have not been undertaken for either of these dams. Even elementary safety checks have not been performed and government regulators are absent. The hydropower authorities claim that the activity is part of preparatory work for feasibility studies, but actual construction work – the building of roads, spillways and abutments – is underway. Waste material from the work is being dumped directly into the Jinsha River and the increase in silt is damaging the hot-arid valley ecosystem. More critically, the dam’s reservoir lies over the Chenghai fault and near unstable mountain slopes that are vulnerable to landslides, mudslides and earthquakes. In August 2008, a mudslide near the Ludila dam killed eight people. EIAs are clearly essential when constructing dams in an area this prone to geological incidents.

At the site of the Ahai dam, in Yongsheng county, the construction I witnessed on an earlier visit in April last year was not visible, but the project was still going ahead without official approval. Construction subsidiaries of the Sinohydro Corporation started preliminary work three years ago, completing roads, spillways and abutments. On my recent trip I found that the environment authorities were still planning to visit and decide if they would approve the project. But they will be presented with a dam that is as good as built. The lack of an EIA meant the project was illegal, so work was carried out in secret. Signs declaring the site a “military zone” were erected to discourage visitors. Meanwhile, the company behind the dam project at Jin’anqiao, in Yulong county, have not bothered with an EIA at all: spillways, abutments and the dam itself are all finished and generators are being installed for testing.

A plan for a string of eight dams along Tiger Leaping Gorge was one of the first hydropower projects to attract media attention, and the scheme was abandoned as a result. However, new economic circumstances have led to the project being relaunched upriver under another name: the Longpan dam. The project is essentially the same, and exploratory drilling and infrastructure construction are now taking place. If a dam is built at Longpan, 100,000 people living by the Jinsha River will be forced to relocate and 200,000 mu of farmland (133 square kilometres) will be inundated. This will mean the 40-billion-yuan (US$5.9 billion) project will also have a direct impact on the central government’s pledge to maintain a minimum of 1.8 billion mu (1. 2 million square kilometres)of arable land. The results of the EIA for this project are forthcoming.

At the site of the Saige dam on the Nu River, I saw work on tunnels and construction campsites taking place. The tributaries of the Nu River have been divided up among contractors for preparatory construction work. Despite the lack of an EIA, work has been underway for the last few years. No other project is as controversial as the Nu River: issues of biodiversity, soil loss, geological dangers, displacement and cultural heritage have all received media attention. However, journalists and the public face an uphill struggle as they struggle to protect China’s last major undeveloped river. The Yabiluo dam is planned only 5.5 kilometres from a UNESCO World Heritage site, with its reservoir extending to less than three kilometres away. The Maji reservoir is even closer: the dam itself will be just over two kilometres from a World Heritage site, with the waters of the reservoir 810 metres away. When faced with a choice between heritage preservation and hydropower projects, local governments will always find an excuse to opt for the latter.

Soil, vegetation and rivers will suffer worst from these hydropower developments, as will generations of ethnic minority peoples – Yi, Lisu, Nu, Pumi, Naxi and Tibetans – who live in the region. They are willing to sacrifice their interests for the sake of the nation and want only to be able to survive. The homes and living conditions of the Naxi people in the town of Shigu, in Lijiang – a major crossing point the during the Long March – and Chezhou village, in Shangri-La county, show that they became better-off than many others in China. However, hydropower projects may throw them back into poverty. The majority of locals are unwilling to move. If the project will benefit both the nation and the people, they ask, then why not carry out a public EIA?

Hydropower developments incur massive social and environmental costs. Reservoirs inundate huge areas of farmland and ecosystems, and construction dumps large amounts of dirt into rivers, harming irrigation works downstream. The relocation of residents puts pressure on land resources, while inundated fields release methane – a powerful greenhouse gas – into the atmosphere. Even if we ignore “soft” factors such as the impact on heritage, culture and scenery, hydroelectricity is by no means “clean” power. But in Yunnan province it seems nothing can stand in the way of these projects. EIAs have become a marginalised and decorative process, seen as just a part of the cost of doing business. Both the builders and local government know that, to date, an EIA has never managed to halt a dam project.

We can ruin all of China’s river ecosystems for the sake of profit, but we will find that the money we earn cannot offset what we have lost. Hydropower projects in southwest China need a proper cost-benefit analysis in order to ensure rational development, with full consideration of the impact of constructing and removing dams. The cost to water and land ecosystems, biodiversity, society and cultures needs to be taken into account along with the geological dangers. If the scientific view of development [pdf] were used to guide economic growth, EIAs for hydropower projects would no longer be mere decorations.

Jiang Gaoming is a professor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Botany. He is also vice secretary-general of the UNESCO China-MAB (Man and the Biosphere) Committee and a member of the UNESCO MAB Urban Group.

Homepage photo by My Hobo Soul

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous



What shall we do?

What shall we do? what is the role EIA played during the hydropower projects? Is it powerless or foolish? Could the EIAs alleviate environmental impact hydropower projects made? Besides, the reformers and the developer have little understanding of such concepts as ecosystems and biodiversity.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous




I obtained a graduate diploma of Environmental Management and Development,have learned a lot about EIA process. Wrote an essay about cultural preservation related to Nujiang hydrapower project....sadly to see that everything is the same in China. What is the real problem? I can't see any enforcement of Environmental Law in those dam (damn...) projects. I am not a professional in this area, so can not point my fingure on this issue, but I am sad to see that for the majority's sake, the minority has to sacrifice...

Anybody answer my question? What is the real issue? EIA isn't a new thing, sustainability means long term benefit for everybody and next generation...

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous




Another article from Mr. Jiang. I appreciated very much the appeal in this article. According to the Environment Evaluation Law, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should be applied to any construction project. The purpose of EIA is to estimate and evaluate the possible impact of this construction on the environment, and to use this evaluation as the feasibility checkpoint. The environment issue is actually an economic and social development issue. What we should investigate thoroughly is why they don’t conduct the EIA. This is what the scholars should focus on. From my point of view, if the EIA and its relative feedback is only a procedure to abandon some projects, then the project constructor may take the risk to start the construction without approval; but if the EIA is a part of overall project evaluation and required by the law, how can they skip this part?

The limitations of current EIA include: first, it is used as one of the political tools to abandon projects; second, those who manage the evaluation have made this work and its technology unnecessarily complicated. Regarding the latter limitation, Mr. Jiang, please read any EIA report and you will find what the relevant authorities should focus on. Third, the EIA report will be either weak or unclear. They need to be subjective, concise, and qualitative as well as quantitative. And this weak or unclear report makes the approval even more difficult, which leads to a vicious circle. My suggestion, if Mr. Jiang can read carefully the environment part of basic Dam EIA, and skim through the rest of the EIA, maybe he can write something to improve current situation of Dam EIA. An appeal may push the Environment Protection Authorities to make EIA a simple procedure or even allow construction before approval, but just an appeal may not really work.

The comment was translated by Fangfang CHEN

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous



Please be more realistic

Comrades, ah! Can we be more realistic? How can Hydropower Environmental Impact Assessments stop these occurrences. Is it only for economic reasons that we repair hydropower stations? Don't central decision-makers know the immense value of the ecological environment in these place? So why don't they stop building hydropower stations? These are international rivers, and hydropower station construction upstream will greatly influence the lower reaches. No matter whether in China or in other countries, all actions must adhere to political demands.
It is thought that hydropower station leaders should be saying, "We must overcome all difficulties, bear hardships and work hard, and not fear sacrifice!" So of course, they think nothing of landslides and falling debris.(However, the US leaders will vigorously maintain that the Sanjiangyuan river area should not be developed). If we want to solve the hydropower problem of the western mountain area we should look at it from a political point of view, such as how mediation from the UN or US can allow China and Indochina Peninsula countries to sign water-sharing agreements. Otherwise, there is nothing worth discussing!

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous



China's geography in the eyes of the Chinese

Most Chinese people, especially intellectuals (mainly Han people), live to the southeast of the Hei River-Tengchong line. They turn a blind eye to beautiful rivers, eg. the Nujiang and the Lantsang,(and of course, the Heilongjiang), let alone love and cherish them. In their eyes, the west of China is desert and wilderness. They look upon it as the Great Northern Wilderness, which is not fit to live in.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous



wxai:the topic is changing

The subject of this article is how to consider the issue of increasing hydropower development as well as the assessment of its environmental impact. As global development proceeds, it poses the question of how to coordinate the relationship between environment and economy. I agree with the limited development position and believe that development should aim at effective environmental protection. As such, how to deal with environmental impact assessment is a technical issue that should not be exaggerated. Together experts should consider solutions toward to the effective implementation of hydropower. We lack the qualifications, technical skills and political understanding to speak of such international issues and water allocation.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous



Writing must be based on facts

No matter what kinds of comments one posts, the comments should be based on fact. If you are not a professional in this industry, you should not make presumptuous comments based on rumours. First of all, there is a lot of work that needs to be done before a power-station can be built. Such work may include clearing the way for construction and conducting geo-technical investigations. These jobs are carried out on different sites, which may lead people to think that the project has started, where in actual fact it hasn't. Secondly, I myself work in the above-mentioned power-station. Our environmental evaluation has been conducted and approved by the National Environmental Appraisal Committee in 2007. Who would dare to ignore these matters?