中国与世界,环境危机大家谈

china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
envelope

注册订阅每周免费邮件
Sign up for email updates


文章 Articles

Geoengineering: plastic forests

chinadialogue

Readinch

Could synthetic trees help to cool the planet? chinadialogue continues its series that examines geoengineering proposals from scientists around the world.

article image
 

What’s the big idea?

Forests of synthetic “trees”, designed to capture and store carbon dioxide, could be used to effectively offset climate-warming emissions and help cool the planet.

How would it work?

Plastic ion-exchange membranes can capture carbon dioxide in air. This technique is already used in water purifiers and ventilation systems on submarines, but it has never been applied for atmospheric carbon capture.

Scientists, including Wallace Broecker and Klaus Lackner, claim that passing humid air across the membranes would make recharging them a carbon-neutral process: humid conditions would greatly reduce the energy cost of removing the captured carbon. Consequently, even taking emissions produced by the removal process into account, there would remain a net removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Once released, this carbon dioxide could be chemically bonded with carbon-loving ultramafic rocks and sequestered permanently underground. This breakthrough, its proponents say, effectively opens the door for the kind of large-scale capture and storage once dismissed as impossible.

What are the risks?

Unlike many geoengineering proposals, the scheme does not attempt to manipulate fragile and unpredictable ecological processes in the pursuit of its ends. Proponents of “scrubbing” argue that since all it does is to remove what humans have put there in the first place, the potential side-effects are few.

However, such schemes were criticsed in a Greenpeace report in May 2008 for diverting attention away from the more pressing issue of emissions reduction. The green group argues that this kind of unproven technology is the perfect smokescreen for polluters seeking an excuse to carry on with business as usual.

There also remain considerable questions about cost, scale and timescale. A working prototype “tree” is still two years away. Lackner himself admits that it would take 10 million of them (produced at no small environmental cost) to capture even a tenth of annual emissions. With fossil fuel use expanding rapidly across the developing world, successful implementation might not arrive quickly enough. The question of storage still presents a substantial hurdle.

Our verdict

Lack of even a working prototype means it remains hard to predict what kind of impact the technology may ultimately have. Nevertheless, the principle itself is substantially less risky than many proposed geoengineering solutions; it does not deserve to be dismissed out of hand before its feasibility has been established.
 

Homepage image by jonathan mcintosh

评论 comments

4

评论 comments

中文

EN

嗨 Hi Guest user

退出 Logout /


发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:

人造树?

这种人造树有点难以置信,按照这种逻辑,我们也不要什么绿色植物了,不需要去保护森林,因为一切都可以用人造植物来代替了,唯一需要的就是拨给科学家们大量的钱,让他们加紧研究,让人造树推广起来。

Synthetic trees?

This kind of synthetic tree is a little hard to believe in. By this logic, real forests will be of little importance to us, since the synthetic trees will take the place of real ones. So, the only needed is to give the scientists a big wad of cash to speed them in their research, and spread the technology as widely as we can.

Translated by Tian Liang


种在哪里?

假如要减少大气中的二氧化碳,我们就需要大面积地种人造树,这就出现了一个问题,鉴于有限的土地空间,这些塑料森林将放在哪里?在未来,我们看到一片林子时,是不是都要问一下:这些树是人工的,还是自然的?

Where to plant these forests?

We'll need vast areas of these plastic forests if we want to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. There's a problem here: since land space is limited, where exactly are we going to put them? When we see a grove of trees in the future, will we be constantly wondering whether the trees are natural or man-made?


值得一试

就目前来看,相对于全球变暖的速度,人类的减排行动实在是太慢了,这些努力能在多大程度上起到作用还不得而知。不管是种人造树,还是向大海中添加铁屑,这些想法虽然很疯狂,但也未尝不是一种办法,值得试试。

Worth a try

Regarding the pace of global warming at present, humanity's response to the situation is still too slow, and the extent to which these efforts will have an effect is still unknown. Still, whether it's man-made trees or injecting iron into oceans, they may seem like crazy ideas, but they're all worth trying.

Translated by Jennifer Yip


高科技并不等于“明智的”解决之道

砍下100万棵树去建造100万颗假树,仅仅这个过程就会释放巨大数量的二氧化碳。我觉得那些卷入进一步环境破坏的高科技解决方法根本就不是解决的方法。相反,它们更像是肤浅的把戏。
KMC

High tech does not equal "smart" solution

Just the act of cutting down 10 million trees to install 10 million fake ones would release a significant amount of CO2. I feel that high tech solutions that involve further destruction of the environment are not solutions at all. Rather, they tend to be superficial tricks.
KMC


合作伙伴 Partners

项目 Projects