china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • WeChat

Sign up for email updates

文章 Articles

Outlook and obstacles for CCS (2)

He Gang

Print Readinch

In the final segment of his two-part report, He Gang sets out his technical and policy recommendations for China's adoption of an important technology.

article image

Considering China’s circumstances and strategic requirements on the energy front, discussed in the previous section of this article, there are three aspects of the situation that need attention if the country is to make the technical and policy preparations for CCS.

First, China needs more more capacity building:

* CCS technology is not yet mature. China needs to focus on research-and-development, particularly with attention to the country's energy security; hold demonstrations of coal-to-liquids, IGCC and CCS technology; explore the economic sustainability of enhanced oil recovery and enhanced coal-bed methane; and analyse and evaluate future CCS technological pathways.

* China’s geology is complex; the country needs to conduct more more surveys of on-shore and off-shore coal, oil, gas basin and salt formations that have the potential for carbon sequestration. Comprehensive surveys of geological structure, storage potential, the risk of leakages and the feasibility of monitoring are necessary.

* There needs to be risk evaluation and management for all stages of CCS: capture, transportation and storage.

* China must establish CCS management structures, laws and regulations.

* China needs to increase public awareness of CCS, which means increasing public knowledge of the value and the risks of the technology.

Second, sources of funding should be expanded. Currently, fund transfers mainly take place via the international carbon market. As the funds available for CCS in China are very limited, international financial investment and support are very important.

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is one of the Kyoto Protocol’s three mechanisms, and is a key part of encouraging developing nations to participate in global emission reductions. Currently, its executive board has raised the possibility of allowing CCS projects under the CDM. This is still highly controversial; opponents hold that CCS emissions reductions will weaken the effectiveness of the CDM’s market in Certified Emission Reductions (CERs).

In the current market, carbon dioxide (CO2) costs between 8 and 23 Euros (US$12 to $34) per tonne: much less than the cost of CCS (from 50 to 100 Euros, or US$75 to $150, per tonne of CO2). Even if CCS were included as a CDM project, there would be a significant price gap, which means CCS would have to be funded through other channels.

The fluctuating price of CERs also means that CCS will struggle to attract stable investment through this channel. Sectoral emissions reduction mechanisms may bring the power sector as a whole into emissions reduction arrangements, but this is still at an exploratory stage. Therefore, an international climate-change agreement must find new financial mechanisms to meet the needs of CCS implementation.

Third, we must strengthen international cooperation. International probes into CCS are still underway. The United Kingdom has legislated that new power plants must be “carbon-capture ready” if they are to connect to the power grid. The United States has announced an investment of US$1 billion to restart the FutureGen project, and is to build an IGCC+CSS demonstration plant in the mid-western state of Illinois. The European Union’s economic stimulus plan includes 1.05 billion Euros (around US$1.6 billion) in investment for CCS technology at seven power plants, with a “CCS Alliance” of 12 demonstration plants to be formed by 2012. In July 2009, China and the US announced plans to develop the “US-China Clean Energy Research Center”.

As cooperation between China and the US, Canada, the EU, Japan, Australia and other countries continues in the CCS field, China will form global links to the CCS industry, remain up-to-speed with technical advances and exchange know-how. This will lay the foundations for China to master the technology – and participate in the global effort to address climate change.

For more information, download the full report
Real Drivers of CCS in China and Implications to Climate Change Policy by Richard Morse, Varun Rai and Gang He.

He Gang is research associate at Stanford University’s Program on Energy and Sustainable Development. [email protected]

Homepage image from

评论 comments


评论 comments



嗨 Hi Guest user

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:


碳捕获和封存技术的价值被低估。实验证明,CCS需要先将碳冷却至零下60度,然后注入2千米的地下层,再在地表获取120度的气体。依照Robert Vincin 模型(见谷歌中英文),通过封存大量二氧化碳将为中国带来大量收入,农民也能种植粮食作物。《京都议定书》为中国制造了大量工作机会和收入。 Follow science/Nature proven CO2 -carbon Cycle Robert Vincin Beijing

(注:此评论涉及专业内容,若翻译有误,请来信告知 [email protected])

Dangers in CCS

CCS is a valued resource wasted. CCS needs refrigeration -60degrees pumped 2 ks into earth to plus 120 degrees gassed returns to surface mass damage as past experiments proved. Follow Robert Vincin model (see Google Chinese English) desert reversal via mass CO2 sinks making serious income for PRC and Farmers back growing food Livestock.
Kyoto protocol generates massive jobs and income for PRC. Follow science/Nature proven CO2 -carbon Cycle

Robert Vincin


碳被人们以各种各样的形式应用最后转化为二氧化碳,然后进入大气中等待C4植被来进行消耗并把它转化为土壤碳,从而最终完成了碳循环。根据CDM机制,发达国家如美国需要交纳5-8 美元的税,但当发达国家进行自由交易时,税价格将会上涨到12-25美元。这是不公平的。中国有专门的技术让二氧化碳进入碳循环从而改变沙漠化的现状。自然已经以固定的形式存在了30亿年,为何还让石油公司去倾卸毒素呢?
——Robert Vincin

Earths carbon factory

Carbon in its many forms converted by man to CO2e sits in the atmosphere awaiting the day C4 vegetation factory to consume it to make soil carbon completing the Carbon Cycle. Following a Developed nations CDM impost at US$5-8.00, when developed nations will trade at Voluntary $12-25 is unfair. China has expertise to use CO2 to complete carbon cycle to desert reversal. Nature set model 3 billion years, why do we let oil companies dump toxins? -- Robert Vincin Beijing

合作伙伴 Partners

书评 Books