中国与世界,环境危机大家谈

china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
envelope

注册订阅每周免费邮件
Sign up for email updates


文章 Articles

New order from ashes of crisis

Larry Elliott

Readinch

China, India and other developing countries will benefit from the economic turmoil at the expense of the US – and the World Bank is optimistic, writes Larry Elliott.

article image
 

The wrenching financial crisis of the past two years will provide the catalyst for a profound change in the global economy – which, according to the man running the World Bank, will see China and India become established centres of power, the US dollar eclipsed as the sole reserve currency, and Latin America, south-east Asia and Africa emerge as new sources of growth.

But as he surveys the wreckage caused by what the bank and its sister organisation, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), agree is the most severe crisis since the devastation caused by the second world war, Robert Zoellick is surprisingly upbeat about the future.

Asked by The Observer how he envisages the global economy in 20 years’ time, Zoellick says: “There will certainly be a larger role for the emerging powers, there will be multipolar sources of growth, there will be more south-south trade between developing countries.

“The crisis gives us the opportunity to hasten this process. If we are concerned about the past reliance for growth on the US consumer, we have to make sure consumers in developing countries have enough finance to buy.”

Zoellick says that, while this does not mean the end of the United States as a big player on the world stage, it has brought the curtain down on the unipolar world that followed the collapse of east-bloc communism 20 years ago.

Developing countries were on the rise before the credit crunch and, as the snapshot of the global economy released in late September illustrates, their position has been strengthened by their ability to keep growing as the west teetered on the brink of a 1930s-style depression.

“We have reached a tipping point in global economic affairs,” says Stephen King, chief economist of HSBC. “While there are some encouraging signs of recovery in the developed world, the real economic action is taking place elsewhere. For both cyclical and structural reasons, the emerging nations are set to dominate world economic activity in the years ahead.”

America, Zoellick says, can no longer rely on the dollar ruling the roost. The euro and the Chinese renminbi [yuan] are candidates to become reserve currencies.

Tellingly, this year’s annual meetings of the World Bank and IMF took place in Istanbul, the point where Europe meets Asia and for almost two millennia a melting pot for cultures and religions. The view of both Zoellick and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the IMF, is that there is a discernible shift in power and influence eastwards.

“These annual meetings take place at a defining moment in global governance,” Strauss-Kahn says. “We have experienced unparalleled economic co-operation in the last 12 months. It has never happened in history.”

While noting that there is a risk of the consensus vanishing now that the immediate threat of economic meltdown has receded, Strauss-Kahn says it is the will of world leaders to continue collaborating in the years ahead. The days of the Group of Seven (G7) – an elite gathering of policymakers from the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada – are over. Power has shifted to the G20, which includes the G7 plus a number of leading developing countries such as China, India, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa.

John Hawksworth, head of macro-economics at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the United Kingdom, says political influence will result from the increased economic clout of the big developing countries. Within two decades, he says, China may have overtaken the United States as the world’s biggest economy once the lower cost of living is taken into account. “The E7 [Emerging Seven] – China, India, Brazil, Russia, Turkey, Indonesia and Mexico – could be a lot bigger than the current G7,” he adds.

PwC estimates that the global economy will double in size by the end of the 2020s to US$143 trillion at today’s prices, with the E7 accounting for almost 40% of gross domestic product (GDP) and the G7 30%. “The E7 is already not that far behind the G7 and that process has been accelerated by the current crisis, which has hit the developed world harder than the big emerging economies,” says Hawksworth.

Like Zoellick, he thinks the dollar will no longer be the dominant currency. “The dollar, the euro and the renminbi will form a basket of currencies. The world will be different. The recession has accelerated that process.”

The IMF and the World Bank are still set in their original mould, he says. “Voting shares are going to have to change and it will be a gradual process. But it is possible that there will be a Chinese head of the fund or bank by that time.”

Such an outcome would symbolise the changing of the guard. There has been a gentlemen’s agreement that the head of the World Bank should be chosen by the Americans, the single biggest shareholder in the two institutions, while the managing director of the fund is picked by the Europeans. Zoellick is a former US trade representative; Strauss-Kahn was once France’s finance minister.

“There is an inevitability about this [shift in power to Asia],” says Hawksworth. “You can already see it in the business world, as witnessed by the HSBC decision [to strengthen its emerging-markets focus]. The centre of economic gravity is shifting and will continue to shift.”

Zoellick says the spread of prosperity to the poor parts of Asia, Latin America and Africa will be accelerated by investment in infrastructure, social safety nets and manufacturing.

Critics say the bank and the fund have too rosy a view of the future. One threat, recognised by the IMF, is that the 3.1% growth pencilled in for 2010 following the first year of global economic contraction since 1945 will prove a false dawn. Once the artificial stimulus of public borrowing wears off, the fear is that a rationing of credit by enfeebled banks will prevent the private sector from taking up the baton.

Another issue is the willingness of the old world to cede power. The IMF and World Bank were set up at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 and their governance still reflects the dynamics of the 1940s. Reforms are being undertaken, but they are neither radical nor rapid enough to satisfy campaigners.

Peter Chowla of the Bretton Woods Project, a London-based NGO, says the changes amount to a “lick of paint on rotten foundations”.

Finally, there are those who believe the determination of the World Bank and IMF to return as quickly as possible to the high levels of growth seen earlier this decade ignores the elephant in the room – that, by 2029, traditional fossil fuel stocks will be running dry.

Andrew Simms, head of policy at the New Economics Foundation (nef) think tank, says: “One major thing that will describe the landscape in 2029 is that we will be beyond the point of peak oil. That will be the trigger for so many dominoes to fall.” Decisions made in the next few years, he adds, will be critical. “There is the risk of enormous knock-on effects on trade and food supply, with the food price volatility of the last year looking like a vicar’s tea party.”

He believes food security will replace gross domestic product as the yardstick of success, and there will be an emphasis on the new “three Rs” – reduce, repair, recycle.

In one respect, Zoellick, Strauss-Kahn and Simms are in full agreement: decisions taken in the next two or three years will shape the next two or three decades.

“We are balanced on a knife edge,” Simms says. “The potentialities are wonderful; the probabilities deeply disturbing.”


www.guardian.co.uk/

Copyright Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

Homepage image by aldask

评论 comments

2

评论 comments

中文

EN

嗨 Hi Guest user

退出 Logout /


发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:

世界银行正在努力寻求自己的角色

世界货币基金组织和世界银行在某种程度上是目前金融危机的缔造者。它们对于经济增长的教条是注重数量而不是质量。越是贫穷的国家,他们的环境就越无法从政策中受益。

有人认为作为核国家并且拥有数万亿美元美国国家债券的中国仍然能够从世界银行合法获得贷款,这是世界银行带来的首条道德风险。鉴于中国的纪录,考虑到中国海外发展援助对社会和环境的负面影响,世界银行在这方面顺从它自身的政策,或许将会使问题恶化。

本评论由Li Huan翻译

The World Bank is struggling to find a role for itself

The IMF and the World Bank are to some extent architects of the current financial crisis. Their dogma of economic growth is about quantity not quality. The poor and the environment rarely benefit from their policies.

The idea that China - which despite being nuclear armed and owning trillions of US dollars worth of US national debt continues to be eligible to receive World Bank loans - should be top dog of the World Bank would introduce an element of moral hazard. Given China's record concerning the (negative) social and environmental impact of much of its overseas development assistance, there would presumably be a deterioration in the World Bank's compliance with its own policies in this respect.


南南合作

国际包容性增长政策中心(IPC-IG)通过www.ideas4development.org 论坛,邀请民众对于印度,巴西和南非三方合作(IBSA)政策及南南合作进行讨论。希望能创造一个有利于讨论的开放环境, 能让所有声音都能被听到,最终能实现包括民间社会,学术界和权威人士各个角度和层面的全面的讨论。2010年4月15日,将有一个由IBSA峰会引领的学术论坛在巴西首都巴西利亚举行。该学术论坛的成果将在峰会上正式公布。
要了解有关的学术论坛,可以去http://www.ipc- undp.org/ipc/HomeIBSA.do。参加辩论的您可以访问ID4D的网站:http://www.ideas4development.org/en/topics.html。

South-South Cooperation

The International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) are inviting civil society discussion about India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) policy and south-south cooperation via their discussion forum on www.ideas4development.org. The aim is to create a discussion friendly environment where all voices can be heard with the ultimate objective of getting a tridimensional discussion on the blog including commentators from civil society, academia and power holders. There will be an Academic Forum which is held in the lead up to the IBSA Summit held in Brasilia, Brazil on the 15th of April, 2010. The outputs of the Academic forum will be formally reported at the Summit.


To find out more about the Academic forum you can go to http://www.ipc-undp.org/ipc/HomeIBSA.do. To join the debate you can visit the ID4D website: http://www.ideas4development.org/en/topics.html.


合作伙伴 Partners

项目 Projects