文章 Articles

Slow-motion tragedy for sea life

In the aftermath of the BP oil leak, the wildlife haven Grand Isle is at the heart of the environmental catastrophe engulfing the US coast of Louisiana, writes Suzanne Goldenberg.

Article image

Out on the water, it starts as a slight rainbow shimmer, then turns to wide orange streamers of oil, whipping through the waves. Later, on the beach, we witness a vast, Olympic-sized swimming pool of dark chocolatey syrup left behind at low tide, and thick dark patches of crude bubbling on the sand.

The smell of the oil on the beach is so strong it burns your nostrils, and leaves you feeling dizzy and headachey even after a few minutes away from it.

According to Alaska-based marine biologist Rick Steiner, my companion on a boat ride through the slick, this is the most volatile and toxic form of crude oil in the waters and lapping on to the beaches of Grand Isle, the area at the heart of the slowly unfolding environmental apocalypse that has engulfed Louisiana, and is now moving eastwards, threatening Mississippi, Alabama and the Florida Panhandle.

Fifty-three days after BP’s ruptured well began spewing crude oil from 5,000 feet (1,500 metres) below the sea, the wholesale slaughter of dolphins, pelicans, hermit crabs and other marine life is only now becoming readily visible to humans.

So too is the futility of the Obama administration’s response effort, with protective boom left to float uselessly at sea or – in the case of the Queen Bess Island pelican sanctuary that we visit – trapping the oil in vulnerable nesting grounds.

Steiner, 57, a veteran of America’s last oil spill disaster, the Exxon Valdez in 1989, says he is in the Gulf of Mexico “to bear witness”, and for days he has been taking to the beaches and the waters in a Greenpeace boat gathering evidence.

The first casualties on Steiner’s tour appear minutes after our boat leaves the marina and moves through Barataria Pass, prime feeding ground for bottlenose dolphins. Several appear, swimming, eating, even mating in waters criss-crossed by wide burnt-orange streamers of oil. All are at risk of absorbing toxins, from the original spill and from more than 1.2 million gallons (4.5 million litres) of chemicals dumped into the gulf to try to break up the slick, says Steiner.

“They get it in their eyes. They get it in the fish they eat and it is also possible when they come to the surface and open their blowhole to breathe that they are inhaling some of it,” he says.

The Greenpeace crew turns up the throttle and the boat pulls up to the orange-and-yellow protective boom around Queen Bess Island, which was intended as a haven for the brown pelican. These birds, until recently, were on the federal government’s list of endangered species and were doing OK – but now that recovery appears to have been abruptly reversed.

A dark tide line of oil encircles the island, and has crept into the marsh grasses, where the pelicans nest. Many, if not most, of the adult birds had patches of oil on their breast feathers. Nearly all are doomed, says Steiner -- if not now, then at some point not too far in the future. “The risks in here to birds are not just acute mortality right here, right now,” he says. “There is mortality we won’t see for a month or two months, or even a year.”

He points out a pelican standing so still it looks like it’s been made out of a slab of chocolate, another frantically flapping its spread wings to try to shake off the oil, and then another manically pecking at the spots on its chest. “He could be a candidate for cleaning, and he may survive,” Steiner says. “He obviously won’t if he’s not cleaned.”

Rescue teams have plucked hundreds of birds from the muck. But stripping oil from the feathers of stricken birds is a slow and delicate operation, and there is no assurance of the birds’ survival. About a third of the rescued birds have died so far.

As we pull up to Queen Bess Island, two crew boats are at work shoring up the two lines of defence for the island: an outer ring of orange-and-yellow protective boom intended to push the oil back out to sea, as well as an inner ring of white absorbent material that is supposed to suck up any of the crude that gets through.

Since oil began lapping at the Louisiana coast, the government has set down 2.25 million feet (685,000 metres) of containment boom and 2.55 million feet (nearly 780,000 metres of absorbent material. But local sports fishermen on Grand Isle complain that response crews bungled the protection zone for Queen Bess because they only put a portion of the island behind the orange-and-yellow barrier boom. That turned the boom into traps that pushed even greater quantities of oil onshore. Steiner agrees: “I would say 70% or 80% of the booms are doing absolutely nothing at all.”

The efforts on the beaches seem equally futile. By day workers in white protective suits march along the sands of the state park on the eastern end of Grand Isle, trying to suck up the oil. But as the tide goes out there is only more oil to be found, and dozens of dead hermit crabs that have struggled to flee to shore.

Steiner says he has seen it all before, after the Exxon Valdez went aground in 1989, and then in other oil spills he has monitored around the world from Lebanon to Pakistan. There is, he says, a drearily familiar pattern. “Industry always habitually understates the size of a spill and impact as well as habitually overstates the effectiveness of the response.”

In the case of the Exxon Valdez, he says, the environmental impacts persisted for months or years after the tanker went aground. That catastrophe, which saw 11 million gallons (nearly 42 million litres) of crude dumped into the pristine waters of Alaska, occurred within the space of six hours.

This spill is much worse. BP’s well on the ocean floor has been spewing greater volumes of crude oil into the water since April 20. Even by the US administration’s most optimistic forecasts, it will keep gushing until August, and the clean-up could last well into the autumn.

“This is just the start. It is going to keep coming in even if they shut the damn thing off today,” says Steiner.


www.guardian.co.uk/

Copyright Guardian News and Media Limited 2010

Homepage image by International Bird Rescue Research Center

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

有意思

这篇文章专门讨论了海洋污染。有意思的是,我刚在生态学家(http://www.theecologist.org/)读到,英国为未来几年做出的碳零排放计划:不会在地球上制造污染,不会在那个叫做英国的英伦岛屿群上制造污染。很不幸,这个国家仅提出空气碳零排放计划,而没有海洋石油零泄露计划。尽管它对墨西哥湾石油泄漏负主要责任。而且事实上,在过去的历史中,它曾经是海上最活跃的征服者。它对于空气,海洋和陆地难以综合在一起考虑,坚决拒绝空气污染,却持续上演土地和海洋污染,这您得留意关注。
meleze

Interesting...

This article talks about the pollution in the sea. What's interesting is, I just read in the ecologist (http://www.theecologist.org/), the UK's zero carbon emissions scheme for the future: they will not pollute the earth, they will not pollute the group of islands called the United Kingdom. Unfortunately, this country only mentions a plan for zeron carbon emissions but there is no plan for zero oil spills in the sea. Although they took primary responsibility for the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, it actually use to be history's most active conqueror of the sea. It is difficult for them to collectively think about air, sea and earth. They firmly reject air pollution, but continue to pollute the earth and the sea, this you have to pay attention to. meleze