文章 Articles

Fixing the food chain

The Shanghai Expo has triggered a familiar clampdown on food-safety violations in China. But, says Jiang Gaoming, the public needs protecting all the time – not just at international events.

Article image

By the time it closes in October, the Shanghai World Expo is expected to have attracted 206 nations and international organisations, and 70 million visitors – 400,000 to 500,000 each day. When I visited the Expo site prior to its opening, I found myself wondering what all these visitors would eat, and how that food would be kept safe.

The organisers started identifying catering providers for the Expo Park very early on – from sit-down restaurants, fast-food chains and snack shops to food courts and coffee bars. Leading Chinese and overseas caterers have been brought in, with food from every part of the world. And food transported into the Expo Park or into Shanghai is subjected to strict testing.

The news that food quality would be a key issue for the Expo quickly spread throughout China. In rural Shandong, in the east of the country, cattle merchants have always always tended to choose cows that have been fed additives to increase leanness, as these animals yield more meat, and therefore more profit. But now the merchants are rejecting additive-fed cows as the meat cannot be sold in Shanghai. The farmers who listened to the merchants in the past have been left high and dry.

China has clamped down on the manufacture and sale of leanness enhancers in the wake of poisoning incidents in Guangzhou and elsewhere. But traders have been illegally selling clenbuterol – the raw material used to make the additives – to cattle farmers. This has almost become an unwritten rule of the beef and pork industry. My organic farming project in Shandong has been helping farmers raise cows on waste straw rather than additives, but we can’t get a decent price for the animals. The buyers look at the large stomachs of our cattle and drop the price, paying 14.8 yuan (US$2.17) per kilogram for a live animal – compared to 15.6 yuan (US$2.29) per kilogram for an additive-fed beast with its small stomach, low levels of fat and lean meat.

But the recent refusal to buy additive-fed cows is not due to a sudden attack of conscience. The merchants simply do not dare to take any chances with the food safety rules put in place for the Shanghai Expo. And so all traces of leanness enhancers have to be eliminated.

We only ever worry about food safety for one of two reasons: either there have been illnesses or deaths, such as melamine poisoning from milk powder, clenbuterol poisoning from leanness enhancers in pork or malnutrition from fake milk powder. Or there is a major international event taking place, such as the 2008 Olympics, or this year’s Expo. But in neither case are the root problems addressed, and once the clampdowns slacken off, everything returns to normal – the clearest demonstration of this being two scandals over milk powder occurring just two years apart.

During the Beijing Olympics, the authorities boosted food-safety supervision at the event’s designated caterers and released a document specifying eight areas for oversight and setting out 35 detailed rules. Nothing was left to chance. Food is of prime importance to the public and any food-safety incident during a major international event presents a poor image to the world. So no room can be left for error.

But, in reality, the far greater concern is food safety after those incidents or events. Besides appealing to the morality of those manufacturing, processing and growing food, it may be possible to achieve results by looking at the hidden chains of interests in the sector. Taking the meat trade as an example, we have a chain running from cattle farmers to cattle traders to slaughterhouses to meat markets and finally to urban consumers.

The consumers blindly purchase lean meat, while the merchants claim that this is what the market demands. Getting lean meat from animals reared naturally is expensive and leaves little room for profit. There is more money from those raised on leanness enhancers and so the ban has had little effect. But it would not be hard to reduce the usage of those additives if consumers sought out meat with layers of fat, which is less likely to contain the additives.

Although the use of leanness enhancers is explicitly banned in China, it is hard to detect usage. The tests need to be done before slaughter, and cost at least 150 yuan (US$22) per head, which means only a sample of animals can be checked. The costs are even higher for large animals such as cows. And this is not a test that the consumers can carry out themselves.

I propose that food safety issues arising from chains of interest such as this be dealt with by: the state maintaining strong supervision of food safety over the long term; switching from monitoring samples at slaughterhouses to testing of live animals at farms in order to scare off users of illegal additives at the source; helping consumers to identify healthy foods and to understand that they cannot be produced unless animals are reared naturally; and for farmers to learn not to cause harm to others and ultimately themselves for slightly larger profits. Stronger action against illegal foodstuffs and animal fodder is needed in order to provide the public with healthy food and drink.


Jiang Gaoming is a professor and PhD tutor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Botany. He is also vice secretary-general of China Society of Biological Conservation and board member of China Environmental Culture Promotion Association.

Homepage image from Environmental Protection Bureau of Wendeng 

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

肉类加工业的问题

在肉品供应链中存在许多大问题,还有如漂浮在河中的死猪等相关的问题。上周所宣布的大型打击应该是要延续到今年年末的。
瘦肉精问题非常有意思。由于进口猪的品种能够生产更瘦的猪肉,中国庞大人口的遗传基因已经很大程度上被完全改变了。但是,所有人都抱怨现在的猪肉没有一点肉味。我看过某些营养学“专家”写的一篇文章,他们认为中国人需要一个脂肪税来强制人们吃少一点脂肪,但是我觉得他们是毫无实际可言的。

写于美国华盛顿哥伦比亚特区

problems in the meat industry

There are big problems in the meat supply chain and related problems like dead pigs floating in rivers. A big crackdown was announced last week that’s supposed to last the rest of the year.

The lean meat issue is very interesting. The genetics of China’s pig population has been completely transformed in large part because imported pig breeds produce leaner meat. But everybody complains that the meat doesn’t have any taste now. I reviewed a paper by some nutrition “experts” who think Chinese people need a fat tax to force them to eat less fat, but I think they’re out of touch.

Posted from USA, Washington, DC

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

脂肪税

有意思,呵呵。。。那些税收上去可以给健康食品补贴补贴。

A tax on fat

Interesting, ha ha … The collection of these taxes can subsidise healthy food. (translated by smc)

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

请三思肉类产品的食用

我在为世博会美国馆工作,我们的西餐厅甚至出现食物中毒的个案。由于游客量很大,要快速地为许多人提供食物,很明显粮食供应商和卖方都在偷工减料。此外,不论在博览会中,甚至在中国更大的范围内,人们的食肉量都很惊人。先不说肉类产品对环境有害,如此大量地消耗也促使人们投机取巧,使用生长激素和添加剂以获取利润。我期待着看中国如何实践“城市让生活更美好”的世博会的信条,加强食品法规以及对于健康和肉类消耗环境影响的教育工作。

3li4s

Re-think meat

I'm working at the World EXPO for the USA pavilion and we have even had cases of food poisoning at our Western Café. Given the large volume of visitors its obvious that food vendors and suppliers are cutting corners to provide food for so many people in a quick manner. Moreover, the amount of meat that people are eating both at the Expo but also more broadly in China is astonishing. Not only is meat production detrimental to the environment but also opens up doors for people to add growth hormones and additives to increase profit. I'd like to see China live up to the "Better City Better Life" message of the World Expo and work towards stronger food regulations and educate people on the health and environmental impacts of meat consumption.

By: 3li4s

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

新思维

这一结果可谓是世博会意义的深化,为食品安全工作提供了一个新思维:规模效益,产品质量的保障,商品供应及价格的稳定,对社会的稳定具有积极的现实意义。

A new Way of Thinking

We can say this result has deepened the significance of the Expo, as it has provided a new perspective on food safety : scale merit, guarantee of product quality, stabilisation of products' supply and prices. All of them have a positive significance for social stability.