中国与世界,环境危机大家谈

china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
envelope

注册订阅每周免费邮件
Sign up for email updates


文章 Articles

The shadow over rural China

Zhang Yingying

Readinch

Horrified by reports of Chinese “cancer villages”, Liu Lican travelled deep into the countryside to find out more. Here, he tells Zhang Yingying what he saw, and why it should prompt others to act.

article image
 

In 2008, Liu Lican visited 20 “cancer villages” in 20 provinces at his own expense, seeing at first hand the villages that have been sickened by rapid economic development and environmental degradation. He has turned his experiences into a book, China’s Cancer Villages, as yet unpublished. Here, Liu talks to chinadialogue’s Zhang Yingying about his findings.

Zhang Yingying: Why did you decide to visit those 20 cancer villages?

Liu Lican: In 2006 and 2007, I read a lot of reports on environmental pollution and what affected me most was the phrase “cancer villages”. Cancer may be getting more common, but it’s frightening when you’re in a position where villages are actually being called this. And in most of the cases I looked at, there was a suspected link with pollution, so that’s an environmental issue.

I wanted to know: how are these villagers dealing with pollution and disease? Is pollution really to blame for high cancer rates? Is anyone helping them? How do they fight back or look after themselves? What has been causing all these cancer villages to appear in the last two decades? Can we do anything about it?

There were no answers available, so I decided to go and have a look for myself and learn about the situation. I knew that one person alone can do very little, but I thought that once I understood what was happening perhaps I could tell people or organisations with more resources or power – and they would be able to help. 

ZY: What did you see in the cancer villages?

LL: In most cases, there is no difference in appearance between a cancer village and any other Chinese village. People live as if nothing major has happened: they work, they build houses, they go off to find jobs. But if you watch for a while, you start to notice certain characteristics. It may be that some villagers are using bottled water as they can’t drink water from wells or rivers anymore; or those living closest to the source of pollution have moved; or that the area around those sources is bare and the villagers say it has been years since anything has grown there; or maybe rivers or ponds have been ruined by pollution and are just used for dumping rubbish.

Villagers told me that pollution was causing crops to die off, animals to become infertile or deformed, fish and shrimp to disappear from rivers, children to suffer respiratory diseases. When asked, they would give several examples of serious pollution in their villages. Then, some would say they didn’t know if this pollution was connected to a nearby factory, or that they didn’t believe that my visit – anyone’s visit – would do any good.

That helplessness and lack of hope was sometimes more worrying than the environmental degradation. If everyone gives up and accepts cancer villages as a fact, we’ll just see even more of them.

ZY: Is industrial pollution the main reason for high cancer rates in these locations? And how are those cancer villages distributed?

LL: Industrial pollution is seen as the main culprit in most cancer villages, and the ones that I visited were no exception. I say “is seen as” because you need a lot of evidence to say for sure that the problems are caused by industrial pollution. We can only say that, in many villages, the main suspicion is that factory pollution has caused an increase in cancer and other diseases.

Nationwide, we can see some patterns in cancer villages. Most appeared in the mid to late 1990s and are much more frequently found in eastern and central China than in the west – most likely this is positively correlated with economic development. However, the numbers in the eastern and central regions are fairly equal.

ZY: Why do these high incidences of cancer happen in villages? How does this compare with cities?

LL: I can list several reasons for the emergence of cancer villages: general industrialisation; government failures; poor systems to protect rural people. And these three are all, in fact, the result of the pursuit of economic growth, measured only by GDP. That has brought severe environmental health issues, and particularly so in some rural areas.

High cancer rates are not just a rural phenomenon. Cancer is actually more common in cities, and the media has reported on this. The reason for paying attention to cancer villages is that, in cities, the social safety net is much stronger – healthcare and other resources are concentrated in urban areas and, if there’s a problem, it is easier to get help.

Another issue is that, when villages are polluted, in particular by factories owned by outside investors, or by the treatment of urban waste in the countryside, the villagers receive no compensation for the harm incurred. And in recent years, we have seen industry shift from the coast inland and from cities to villages, and so the harm done to rural areas has been worsening.

It is always the powerful – the parties with resources – who benefit from pollution, while vulnerable populations such as villagers suffer and struggle to get even the most basic assistance. This isn’t just the case in cancer villages; it’s the same for some urban residents. That’s why, ultimately, I raise the issue of “environmental justice”.

ZY: You visited the village of Shutangshan in Hunan province [south China]. What different roles did the villagers, the polluting businesses and the local government play in the cancer cluster there? What were the villagers calling for? And how representative is their situation of cancer villages nationwide?

LL: In general, villagers are the primary and most direct victims. The polluters often deny that they are polluting, much less that there is any link between pollution and cancer. They are either aware in advance of government checks, and so able to make necessary changes in time; or major tax contributors with powerful connections; or, when faced with incontrovertible evidence of their pollution, pay compensation for damage to land but not to health. The chances of punishment are low. Usually, local governments tend towards protecting tax-paying businesses, or have no ability to judge if cancer cases and pollution are linked. And so they are unlikely to actively pursue the villagers’ demands.

But actual situations can be complicated, as the Shutangshan case demonstrates. Some villagers persistently petitioned or sued, some hoped to get compensation, some spoke on behalf of the factory. It was hard for the villagers to get compensation – the factory would cheat them or turn them against each other. The operators would be tipped off about government checks. They delayed, denied and ignored problems.

Later, it was found that the factory had been built, despite not passing the environmental-impact assessment. The local government focused on protecting the factory and was very dismissive of reasonable requests from the villagers, and even used violence after the villagers protested. With that power imbalance, the villagers could only get compensation for minor losses, such as for dead livestock – they couldn’t exercise any more of their rights than that.

ZY: In these cancer villages, the villagers don’t sue on the basis of damage to their health, but for direct economic losses. Why is that?

LL: The relationship between pollution and disease is complex and hard to prove, and that gives government and business an excuse. Meanwhile, the villagers see that some of them get ill, while others stay healthy – and so it is also hard for them to judge the situation. The impact of industrial pollution on crops, livestock, fields, fish and buildings is easier to identify and determine, while damage to the human body is hidden. Compensation for the economic losses is hard enough to come by – suing for damage to health would be even harder.

ZY: What can be done for these cancer villages? What should the government do? What can environmental experts and organisations do?

LL: We need to help the villagers, both medically and legally, and at the very least provide some kind of explanation of what is happening. Prevention efforts in villages needs to be strengthened and government and business behaviour brought into line, which basically means GDP growth targets need to take into consideration people’s fundamental rights to life.

I went and told the villagers I met that, as an individual, there was nothing I could do, but they still spoke to me to see if I might be able to help them. If experts with specialised skills and resources could carry out an independent survey or offer aid, that would be a huge help for the villagers. Increasing knowledge of environment and health issues, boosting provision of clean drinking water, providing assistance such as legal aid, preliminary investigations and calling for outside attention – any of these actions would help.

 

Liu Lican is coordinator of the environmental health and climate change programme at the International Center for Communication Development (ICCD).

Zhang Yingying is assistant editor at chinadialogue’s Beijing office.

Homepage image from Greenpeace

评论 comments

3

评论 comments

中文

EN

嗨 Hi Guest user

退出 Logout /


发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:

环境法在哪里?

可悲的是,这篇文章和“癌症村“的流行没有引起足够的轰动。在过去的多于25年里,农村的贫困人群和自然环境承担了中国的经济崛起带来的毒害甚大的负担。由于人民是不能公开抗议工业污染或腐败(那些确实去北京吐苦水的通常都进了“黑监狱“)任何形式的社会公正都似乎模棱两可。没有理由,一个举办奥运会和世博会的国家竟然没有严格的环境法和准则!

Where is the environmental law?

Sadly this article and the prevalence of "cancer villages" did not come across as shocking. Over the past 25+ years the rural poor and the environment have carried the toxic burden of China's great economic rise. Given the fact that the people are not allowed to publicly protest against industrial pollution or corruption ( those that do go to Beijing to air their grievances often wind up in "black jails") any sort of social justice seems elusive. There is no reason that a country that hosted both the Olympics and the World EXPO does not have a stringent code of environmental law!


郴州癌症村

湖南郴州苏仙区五里牌镇柘源武家组
环境报告

尊敬的领导:
您好!怀着沉重的心情向您汇报郴州五里牌镇柘源村武家组近20年来极高的癌症患病率,高达80%癌症患病率占近年来去世人数总数比率,而且极高患病率主要集中在45~60岁之间的中年人,癌症患病率更趋于年轻化。而且男性患病率明显高于女性,其中仅有的几名癌症女性患者几乎均为土生土长于武家组,而且其他嫁入武家组的女性患癌症率明显低于本地男性。如此高额的癌症患病率不得不值得我们深思,环境问题直接影响和威胁我们的生命安全,如同警钟震撼我们脆弱的心灵。
如今我们的生活条件越来越好,但生活环境却每况愈下。根据记载祖辈的癌症患病率极低,以前的莹莹绿草、蔚蓝天空早已变成阴霾天空,特别是在空气对流情况差的天气,空气质量明显差于其他周边地区。
郴州北湖区许家洞华湘集团(原名711矿),始建于1955年,主要采集冶炼铀矿,但该企业的生产厂区未明显与居民生活区分界封闭,采掘出废弃的矿石、废弃、废渣未经过任何处理直接排放于居民生活区周边环境,但未做任何相关处理,当711矿破产倒闭时,该企业才用泥土覆盖小部分废弃矿石,而且废弃的钢铁废料并未全部深埋于矿井中,很大一部分还是流入到市场中,但任何从1955年开采到2004年倒闭期间未做任何处理和相关提示当地居民,由此可见核废料可能具有相当辐射威胁。我们已经为国家的核工业做出了应有的支持与协助,但国家国家相关政府机构应该关心老百姓的疾苦,如今山上很多矿井和矿石均裸露于居民周边生活环境中,而未作任何防辐射覆盖处理措施。谈及日本最近因为海啸引起福岛核电站爆炸,周边30公里内的蔬菜、水等核辐射全部严重超标,而华湘集团(711矿)却紧邻居民生活区不足1公里。如今人们如此关注生命安全但我们的政府却严严实实的掩盖事情的真相,并未以任何方式通知周边居民注意防辐射措施。
而如今郴州市华湘化工厂的污染甚重,特别是空气、废渣污染,而且周边地区经常酸雨污染,很多果树、蔬菜经常枯死,而且成活率明显低于以往,而且华湘(711矿)对地下水的污染,居民采集的地下水含有高浓度的铁锈。
望各位领导、专家在百忙中抽空关注此民生问题,并能派遣相关专家进行现场抽样取证调查,数百人岌岌可危的生存环境和生命安危真诚期待您的高度关注。
此致
敬礼
五里牌柘源武家组

A village of cancer in Chenzhou

Environmental report of Wujia Zu, Tuoyuan Village, Wulipai Town, Suxian District, Chenzhou, Hunan Province

Dear respected leaders,

Here with this weight on my heart, I would like to give a report on the extremely high cancer morbidity over the last twenty years in Wujiazu, Tuoyuan Village, Wulipai Town, Chenzhou City. There, cancer morbidity rate has climbed up to 80% of the total mortality rate in recent years, with the high range converging on the middle aged (people between 45 to 60 years old), which means the patients suffering from cancer are heading to a younger age group. Besides, the male cancer patients outnumber the female ones, among whom only a few are native residents there, while the other women who married into Wujiazu have an apparently lower cancer rate than the local men. Such high cancer morbidity rate has driven us to ponder. How the environmental problems directly affect and threaten our life safety is just like the way the alarm bell shakes our vulnerable hearts.

As our living conditions are bettered nowadays, the living environment surrounding us has instead been on the downgrade. Previous record shows that the cancer rate of our ancestors was very low. Where there used to be green grass and clear blue sky has already turned into a haze. Particularly when the convection current is poor, the air quality is obviously worse than that in the surrounding area.

Established in 1955, the Huaxiang Group (originally named “Mine 771”) in Xujiadong, Beihu District, Chenzhou, is mainly engaged in excavating and collecting uranium for smelting. Since the production area wasn’t separated from the residential areas, the deserted ores, the discard and the waste residue are directly discharged without any treatment to the surrounding environment of the dwelling area. But there was nobody to deal with that. It was not until the Mine 711 went bankrupt and closed down that the enterprise started to cover a small part of the abandoned ore with earth. Despite that, the discarded steel wastes were not all buried deep down in the mine, a majority of which has still entered the market. From the 1955 when ore mining began to 2004 when the mine was closed down, however, there was neither any dealing with the matter nor any notification for the locals. We can very well conclude from the above facts that the nuclear waste may pose considerable threats of nuclear radiation. We have done what we could to support and assist the country’s nuclear industry, but the relevant government organizations should be concerned about the sufferings of the masses. At present, the residential surroundings are exposed to a large quantity of mines and ores, without any covering measures for radiation protection. While speaking of Japan’s recent explosions in the Fukushima nuclear plant caused by the tsunami that have led to overproof nuclear contamination of vegetables and water etc. within 30 kilometres range of the plant, one shall be reminded that the distance between the Huaxiang Group (Mine 711) and the close by residential area is not even more than 1 kilometre. With people deeply concerned about life safety nowadays, our government on the contrary is covering up the truths as tightly as possible and fail to inform the locals of radiation protection in any ways.

Now the pollution discharged by the Huaxiang Chemical Plant of Chenzhou City is rather serious, especially the contaminations of air and waste residue. As a result, the surrounding areas are frequented by acid rain pollution, and a lot of fruit trees and vegetables oftentimes have withered and died with evidently lower survival rate than that of the previous years. Worse still, the underground water collected by the residents contains high concentration of rust which is caused by the contamination of the underground water by Huaxiang (Mine 711).

It is my sincere hope that leaders and experts can take some time out of your tight schedule to pay close attention to these livelihood issues and send experts concerned to obtain samples and evidence on-site for investigation. The precarious living environment and life safety of these hundreds of people are sincerely waiting for your great concern.

Wujiazu, Tuoyuan Village, Wulipai Town


中国的癌症村

中国政府让我深感失望,尤其是小城市政府所做的苟且之事,从百姓中搜刮民脂民膏。

China Cancer village

I felt so disppointed for the chinese goverment , especially for the small city governor what they have done the bullshit things for us just screw and bride more money from the normal citizens.


合作伙伴 Partners

项目 Projects