中国与世界,环境危机大家谈

china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
envelope

注册订阅每周免费邮件
Sign up for email updates


文章 Articles

Village that towers above China

Jonathan Watts

Readinch

Until recently, Huaxi was a poor farming community in Jiangsu province. Now, thanks to one man’s ambition, it is a symbol of China’s economic expansion, embodied by a 328-metre tower. Jonathan Watts reports.

article image
 

An incongruous new sight has risen up in the countryside of eastern China: a skyscraper taller than any building in London or Tokyo, topped by what looks very much like a giant, golden disco ball. The 328-metre super-tower, which juts out of the Jiangsu plains like a trophy on an empty shelf, was opened in October by the village of Huaxi, a communist model community with a registered population of just 2,000 “farmers”.

Having been built up to the heavens during a period of global economic collapse, the mega-tower will be heralded as the latest symbol of China’s extraordinary economic expansion. But this bizarre new addition to the province’s landscape also speaks volumes about the land pressures, environmental stress, inequality and rash investment that threaten the country’s long-term growth.

The skyscraper will primarily be used as a gourmet dining hall and luxury hotel. Though many of those who live in its shadow earn less than US$16 a day, there is no attempt to hide the wealth gap. From a gold-leaf-covered reception area to a 60th floor inlaid with genuine flakes of gold, the building exudes wealth and excess. Its proudest feature is a one-tonne, solid gold statue of an ox, said to be worth 300 million yuan (about US$47 million).

The mega-statistics do not stop there. With 826 bedrooms and dining facilities for 5,000 guests – including southern China’s biggest banquet hall – there is almost enough space to accommodate and feed all of the original village residents at a single sitting.

It is the brainchild of Wu Renbao, the driving force behind Huaxi’s 40-year transition from a small village to a multibillion-dollar conglomerate with interests in steel, shipping, tobacco and textiles. By turns a communist dictator, capitalist entrepreneur and self-help guru, the 84-year-old is among China’s most colourful characters. He is praised for turning Huaxi into one of the richest villages in China and enriching the original residents with annual shares, dividends and free overseas trips. He is also criticised for turning the community into a family fiefdom, in which workers get no holidays and his relatives get the best posts.


Image by IES Global shows Huaxi village 

He has created a hierarchy largely determined by closeness to the Wu clan. Those from the original 2,000 Huaxi families are at the top of the pyramid. Next come the 35,000 residents from neighbouring villages that have been swallowed up by Huaxi’s expansion. At the bottom are 20,000 newly arrived migrants, who provide labour for the factories on 12-hour shifts without weekend breaks. The monthly salaries of 3,000 yuan (US$470) are better than average for low-skilled labour in China, but it is hardly a worker’s paradise.

Wu is undoubtedly Huaxi’s greatest draw. Coachloads of visitors – mostly cadres and retirees – turn up to listen to the 10.30am lecture he delivers every day in a village auditorium that has been decked out to resemble the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. His close connections to the central government ensure supportive policies – for example, planning permission to build a 72-storey skyscraper in an area where the next-biggest building in less than 20 floors tall. Wu says he looked to the mega-cities of the Middle East for inspiration.

“This tower is my idea,” the patriarch says in such a thick local accent that the interpreter needs an interpreter. “We learned from Dubai, but taking into account our domestic situation, we decided the height should be 328 metres. Why 328 metres? Because that is as tall as the highest building in Beijing.” Chinese culture loads numbers with significance: 32 is associated with business and eight represents prosperity.

As village officials also proudly noted in the invitation to the opening ceremony: “There are 209 countries that lack such a tall building.” That includes the United Kingdom. The Shard London Bridge – which will be the tallest building in the European Union when it is completed next year – is 18 metres shorter than Huaxi’s new village centre.

Even for those used to the speed and scale of change in China, this is astonishing. The last time I visited Huaxi in 2005, it was building a cluster of giant pagodas, which then appeared outlandishly large compared to everything else in the village. Today, those same pagodas barely register in comparison to the super-tower beside them, which pulsates in all the colours of the rainbow when night falls.

It is a tacky but impressive reminder of how far the village has come since the Mao era. That message is reinforced at the village museum, where old propaganda footage shows farmers breaking rocks, labouring in the fields and living in small, unfurnished homes. It is also evident in the small park, which preserves Wu’s first factory, a whitewashed, single-storey building.

“We used to have a very difficult life. We lived in a thatched shed, ate bran and had nothing in our pockets,” recalls Wu, whose message can be distilled to a drive for GDP growth. “I think it will never be wrong to expand the economy and make ordinary people rich. In our opinion, that is the priority.”
This approach has worked for decades and never more so than during the past seven years, when Huaxi’s sales have increased fivefold. But the skyscraper is a towering indicator that business-as-usual is no longer working. The 3.5 billion yuan (US$550 million) investment is designed to attract tourists and new business to Huaxi as it attempts the leap from dirty industrial centre to an ecologically friendly service-sector economy.

In making the transition from third-world village to first-world skyscraper, Huaxi is in many ways a microcosm of China. But the next step will be harder as it tries to cope with the declining competitiveness of its core industry, the inflated cost of land and worries about the environment. In this case, an even wider comparison can be drawn: like the global economy, Huaxi may be bumping up against limits to growth.

Until recently, the village earned half of its income from the iron and steel industry. But today, this has fallen to less than a third. This collapse is due to rising material costs, the expansion of rival firms and falling demand both overseas and in China.

“This is the worst situation I have experienced,” says Yang Yongchang, who has been general manager of the Jiangyin Huaxi Iron and Steel Company for eight years. “It will get worse in the future. People in this industry are panicking.” He says Huaxi is planning to move the factory so it can reinvent itself as a tourist resort and commodities-trading hub. “We’re trying to build an ecological village that looks like a forest garden,” he says.

The costs of fast, dirty, old-style economic growth can no longer be ignored. Wu Yunfang, the head of environmental affairs in the local communist party, says the village has recently shut down five chemical and textile factories that once used to discharge pollutants into the local Zhangjiagang River. She estimates the value of the lost production at 150 million yuan (US$23.5 million), which adds up to a significant environment bill along with the 350 million yuan (US$55 million) spent on emissions scrubbing and wastewater treatment.

Territorial expansion is also becoming more expensive. In the past two decades, Huaxi swallowed 12 neighbouring villages as its industry and influence sprawled outwards. It is not officially a merger. The official terminology is that the villages are “united under Huaxi”, but the reality is far more like a corporate takeover. Huaxi paid an annual fee to the surrounding villages and in return it gained control of economic management, land use decisions, labour issues and political appointments.

The loss of independence is worthwhile, according to Zhang Zhongxian, the former head of Xixiang village, who is now working for Huaxi’s labour federation. Since his community was subsumed by Huaxi in 2002, Zhang estimates that average annual incomes have more than tripled, welfare for the elderly and disabled has improved and homes and roads have been upgraded. “In five to 10 years, we will be where Huaxi is now,” Zhang says. “Many other villagers want to join. Even some from other provinces.”

But land costs have risen dramatically. Huaxi’s village chief, Wu Xie’en – the son of Wu Renbao – said this was a major factor in the decision to build the tower, which has been dubbed “a village in the air”. He says: “With the completion of this building, we can save a vast expanse of land. In China, the trend now is to build tall because the more the economy develops, the more space is needed. Where is the space for China in the future? We must look to the sky.” The party secretary says he wants to turn the “city village” of Huaxi into a Shangri-La. “My father made people rich. Now I want to make them healthy and happy.”

The tower seems an odd way to do this. But the Wus argue that they have succeeded over the years by anticipating changes in the economic wind and gambling big on the outcome. They are trying again this time. Just in case the outside world fails to notice, Huaxi invited the international media to the village’s 50th anniversary celebration, when the skyscraper was officially unveiled. To give visitors a better view, villagers have started a helicopter business – a first step in a planned expansion into commercial aviation and high-end tourism.

If anywhere in China can find new areas of economic expansion, it is Huaxi. But even with the political connections and business nous, it is hard to imagine that the village will reinvent itself as a tourist centre – particularly given the advanced age of the retired party secretary who is its main attraction.

But Huaxi has proved its doubters wrong in the past. Ahead of the opening of the new skyscraper, the mood on the streets was optimistic. In the evening, locals, neighbours and migrants gathered to dance on the village square, a huge expanse of concrete between 15-storey pagodas that pulsate pink, blue, green and yellow. One migrant labourer from the steel factory, who declined to give his name, said the tower would help the economy and create new opportunities.

“Nobody would invest so much money in something that wasn’t sure to be a success, right?”

Additional reporting by Cecily Huang.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/

Copyright © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011 

Homepage image by Chitingshanren 

评论 comments

5

评论 comments

中文

EN

嗨 Hi Guest user

退出 Logout /


发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:

please use resources wisely

Every time I read news about the decisions made by the rich in China, I am disappointed. But they own the money and that's their choices. However, it's sad to see these people's lacking of social responsibilities. It would be more meaningful if the fund is invested in building museums or health centres in the village. And I am sure Wu will be better remembered by the descendants of his villagers by doing so.

请更好地利用资源

每次看到关于中国富人们做出的各种决定的时候,我都感到很失望。但是,钱是他们的,那是他们的选择。然而看到这些人这么缺乏社会责任感,实在是让人心寒。如果将这项资金用于在村里建筑博物馆或医疗保健中心的话,那么这笔钱花的才更加值得更加有意义。我也相信如果吴先生真的这样做的话,他那些同乡的子孙后代们会更加铭记他。


人们对改变的有利反应

总体上,当人们受到批评的时候,不会变得更好。但他们受到表扬的时候,总是积极反应。华西村不是中国最差的地方,它跟从着-有时也领导着中国政府与人民的目标与潮流。这个目标首先是变富,然后再处理垃圾。西方按照自己的日程表也这样做过。现在有些中国人也这么做,就面临虚伪的国际压力。--Philip McMaster

People favourably respond to Change

Generally speaking, people don't change for the better when criticized. But they do respond favourably to praise.
Huaxi Cun is not the worst place in China, and it has been following and sometimes leading the objectives and trends of the government and Chinese people - first it was to get rich - and clean up the mess later. We did this in the West on our own schedule, some Chinese are doing it now under the generally hypocritical pressure of the global community.
Philip McMaster


一个振奋人心的里程碑——如果你从另一个角度解读

我应邀了参加华西村“空中新农村大楼”授牌仪式(http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/05XpJXkiNwI/ ),当时我谈到这栋大楼并不是炫富和挥霍,而是华西村的一个新地标。比起那些千篇一律的别墅,脏乱差的工厂,一切向钱看的态度和人造世界景观,这栋摩天大楼是一个振奋人心 里程碑,它作为可持续发展的标志建筑让人感到震撼和心生敬畏,它能让人们感到天地人和谐发展的信息,体现了吴仁宝“人间天堂”的理念。以社会,环境和经济作为三条支柱,寻求三者的平衡发展是华西村的新理念。

菲利普•麦克马斯特
麦克马斯特商务可持续发展研究所首席研究员,世界可持续发展组织创始人。

An aspirational monument - if you choose to see it that way..

When I was invited to Huaxi Cun for the inauguration of the “Village in the Sky”, (http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/05XpJXkiNwI/ ) I spoke of the new tower as a beacon for all to see, not in terms of opulence and excess, but as a towering 3 element "Symbol of Sustainability" - an aspirational symbol rising above all else - including the cookie-cutter villas, the grubby factories, the money focus and the faux world landmarks - to shock and awe viewers into realizing that all monuments have a message – and this one should inspire people to make the connection between Heaven, Earth and the People (Tian, Di, Ren 天地人) and that to achieve Wu Renbao’s “Heaven on Earth”… the Triple-Bottom-Line balance between Society, Environment and Economy (社会,环境,经济)must become Huaxi’s new ethic.

Philip McMaster,
Principal Researcher, McMaster Institute for Sustainable Development in Commerce
Founder, World Sustainability Organization


“现在华西村富了,接下来呢?”

我的演讲结束后,这栋新大楼的建筑师马旭升(音)反过来称赞了我对他的建筑设计的诠释,说以前从未有人想到这个方面,“加上您说的‘社会、环境、经济’意义后,我们的摩天大楼更加富裕了”。

前一天晚上和华西村领导的聚餐上,我厚着脸皮问了一句:“现在华西村富裕了,接下来呢?”我当时希望他们能够详细阐述下怎样和其他地区分享华西村的财富和技术,以及在生态文明模型的基础上建立起可持续发展的企业。但是,他们的回答很简单,就是:“干杯!”当然,这是可以理解的,因为回答这个问题需要一些思考,而且当时大多数人的注意力仍然在炫耀和庆祝他们至今已取得的成就上。

菲利普•麦克马斯特
麦克马斯特商务可持续发展研究所首席研究员,世界可持续发展组织创始人。

"Now that Huaxi village is rich, what's next?"

Following my presentation, the new building’s architect Ma Xusheng, in turn praised my interpretation of his building’s design, saying that no one had thought of it before, but that “with your new ‘Society, Environment, Economy ‘meaning attached, our building is even richer”.

At a private dinner with village leaders the evening before, I had shamelessly asked: “Now that Huaxi village is rich, what’s next?” – hoping to encourage them to expound on how they were going to share Huaxi’s wealth and expertise with other communities and to build sustainable enterprises based on a model ecological civilisation… however the response was understandable, as a bit more thinking is required; and considering most people’s focus was still on showing off and celebrating what they have achieved so far, the answer was a simple “Gambei!”

Philip McMaster,
Principal Researcher, McMaster Institute for Sustainable Development in Commerce
Founder, World Sustainability Organization


...华西村一定喜欢“三指禅” —— 我们又被邀请了_\!/

我们的“和平 + 1 - 世界可持续发展项目” (www.SustainabilitySymbol.com)和“三指禅”可持续发展符号旨在促进“乐活”——一种健康、快乐、可持续的生活方式。起初是为了中国占世界五分之一的人口而提出,后来作为一个可持续发展的理念被推广到全世界。华西村的领导们肯定是欣赏我们的一些讨论成果,因为他们热烈欢迎了我们的“三根手指可持续发展符号”并且再次邀请我们去分享更多信息。

Philip McMaster(大龙),
商务可持续发展麦克马斯特学院,首席研究员
世界可持续发展组织创始人

...Huaxi must have liked 3 Fingers - we're invited back_\!/

Our “Peace Plus One -World Sustainability Project” (www.SustainabilitySymbol.com ) and the 3 Finger Sustainability Symbol is about promoting LOHHAS – a Lifestyle Of Health, Happiness And Sustainability, first for the 1/5th of the world in China, then to be exported as a sustainable philosophy for the entire planet. The Leaders of Huaxi must have liked something about our discussions, as they wholeheartedly embraced the3 Finger Sustainability Symbol and invited us back to share more_\!/

Philip McMaster,
Principal Researcher, McMaster Institute for Sustainable Development in Commerce
Founder, World Sustainability Organization


合作伙伴 Partners

项目 Projects