中国与世界,环境危机大家谈

china and the world discuss the environment

  • linkedin group
  • sini weibo
  • facebook
  • twitter
envelope

注册订阅每周免费邮件
Sign up for email updates


文章 Articles

China needs political reform to solve its environmental problems

Liu Qin

Readinch

China needs openness of information and public participation to tackle its environmental problems says Li Dun, executive director of the Public Policy Institute at Tsinghua University

article image

China's national environmental problems depicted in a map of the country made from discarded electronic components (Image: adifromusa)

 
chinadialogue (CD): The final text from the Third Plenum gave the environment the same importance as the economy and the political system. What does this mean for the environment?
 
Li Dun (Li): The concept of the “ecological civilisation” was proposed as early as the 17th Party Congress, in 2007. But in China environmental pollution, ecosystem damage and climate change have their own particular causes besides the usual ones.
 
First, the separate administration of urban and rural areas means that much urban pollution is shifted to rural locations; where the rural residents themselves are also creating pollution and nobody takes responsibility for water and soil pollution. Rural pollution ultimately harms everyone through water and the food chain
 
Second, citizens are unable to protect the land and property they use or own from pollution. If the government agrees, businesses can acquire those land use rights; and if local government allows or gives tacit consent businesses can pollute. 
 
Third, the system does not ensure that appeals for help can be made.
 
Fourth, the chances of citizen groups forming to protest pollution are small.
 
Fifth, the law is ineffective and courts rarely hear pollution cases. There is no constitutional court and no investigations of breaches of the constitution. 
 
Six, officials with government environmental protection bodies struggle to enforce the law in the face of strong pressures. 
 
So in economic terms, China’s pollution is a structural problem. In political terms, it is due to the system. In terms of our mode of growth, it is due to the dominance of the state (with a strong government, weak markets, and no society), where the state (the Party) monopolises environmental protection and there are no guaranteed methods for social or public groups to participate. 
 
CD: The final text also calls for a nationwide system to manage natural resources and assets on behalf of the people. What do you think about this?
 
Li: China’s Property Law, which was not passed easily, is ambiguous on some basic matters. “Rights”, based on ownership rights, are the basis of modern law and the market economy, and the foundation of ownership rights is the system for real estate. A “natural resources and assets rights system” must connect with those real estate rights. But a system for natural resources and assets must remain unfixed until real estate rights are reformed and the negative impact of the planned economy era removed. It will be unable to function as part of an already integrated world market, and it may even cause harm.

Many overseas and multinational companies have polluted and damaged the environment in China, which they wouldn’t dare to do, which they couldn’t do, elsewhere. That’s proof. 
 
CD: What about the system of lifetime responsibility for environmental damage? How feasible is this in China?
 
Li: There’s one method which could solve many of China’s problems: openness of information, public participation and holding officials to account. Currently we can’t yet hold officials to account, so how can we talk about doing so on a ‘lifetime’ basis? It’s all very well to talk about it, but the ruling party has to actually do it. 
 
CD: The final text specifies the need to “Establish and perfect an environmental protection and management system for the strict supervision of all emission of pollutants, to independently carry out environmental supervision and administrative enforcement”.

How should we understand the words “all” and “independent”?
 
Li: If we look at “all”, first, this means a supervision system which treats all polluters equally – equal monitoring, equal publication of data, equal chances for victims of pollution to sue and be compensated, equal rights to protest pollution, equal use of sanctions such as business closures. Everyone is equal in front of the law, and there should be no unequal treatment for any reason.

Second, all pollutants that damage health or the environment should be covered, regardless of whether or not they are currently on monitoring lists. New pollutants should be dealt with as they are identified, not ignored and allowed to cause damage as they are not on the list. Monitoring standards should be produced as quickly as possible and the pollutant added to the list. 
 
As for “independent”, it can’t be done. China’s national circumstances are that the ruling party “assumes all responsibility” (as in the Communiqué of the Third Plenum), so there can be no independence.

评论 comments

1

评论 comments

中文

EN

嗨 Hi Guest user

退出 Logout /


发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文 最大字符 1200

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200

排序 Sort By:

无燃料发动机有助中国环境

革命性的科技能减少污染和排放。

非营利机构AESOP正在设计一种以大气热能,亦即太阳能形式运作的发动机。

欲了解更多关于这不可思议的无燃料发动机,请访问www.aesopinstitute.org。

发明者说:把它想成是一台产生电力和排出冷空气的冰箱。

我们正逐渐以24/7的廉价电力取代放射性燃料和化石燃料。

经独立实验室验证,此发动机的原型将为其他减缓污染和气候变化的新科技照亮开发路径。

一旦经过验证并大规模生产,其可以给中国带来迅速取代化石燃料的真正希望。

ENGINES THAT NEED NO FUEL CAN HELP CHINA'S ENVIRONMENT

Pollution and emissions can be reversed with revolutionary science and technology.

The non-profit AESOP Institute is prototyping an engine designed to run on the thermal energy content of the atmosphere, a form of solar energy.

Visit www.aesopinstitute.org to learn more about this hard to believe NO FUEL ENGINE.

The inventor says: think of it as a refrigerator that generates electricity and exhausts cold air.

We are moving toward the birth of 24/7 inexpensive power producing alternatives to radioactive and fossil fuels.

When validated by independent labs, the prototype engine will light an exciting path to other examples of new science that could slow, and possibly point to ways to reverse, pollution and climate change.

Once proven, moving from inexpensive prototypes to mass production can provide genuine hope - a missing ingredient in China where rapidly superseding fossil fuels is concerned.


合作伙伴 Partners

项目 Projects