文章 Articles

Why China will fight for a global climate deal next year

China’s leaders know that an effective treaty on climate change in 2015 is essential to the country’s development, says IPCC China expert Wang Chunfeng

Article image

China has no choice but to restructure its economy, creating the conditions for aggressive climate-change action, says Wang Chunfeng (Image by Qiu Bo/Greenpeace

China is now the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, and so the world will pay close attention to its stance at next year’s climate negotiations in Paris, as well as to the kinds of actions it takes to tackle climate change post-2020.

Despite the fact that China has published a report setting out its policies and actions for addressing climate change every year since 2008, the international community still appears to harbour doubts about its resolve to seek an international deal. But actively tackling climate change is fundamental to sustainable development in China, and this will drive its leaders to push even harder for a new deal next year.  

It isn’t hard to see that China’s motivation is genuine.

First, China is suffering badly from the adverse effects of climate change. Over the last hundred years, the annual average rise in temperatures in China has been higher than the global average. Climate change causes uneven distribution of rainfall and water resources, both temporally and spatially, and intensifies damage from extreme weather events.

Since the 1990s, China has suffered annual average economic losses of over 200 billion yuan (US$32 billion) as a direct result of extreme weather events, and an annual average death toll above 2,000. Climate change continues to impact living conditions – and the ability to achieve sustainable development – in many regions.

The latest reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predict that rising temperatures will grow more pronounced, adverse impacts will intensify and damage from extreme weather events in China will get even more serious. To pursue benefits and minimise harm, China must mitigate the adverse effects of climate change if it wants to achieve sustainable development.

Second, there is no contradiction between the direction of China’s economic development and tackling climate change.

China’s most obvious achievement over the past 30 years has been its rapid economic rise, but the majority of its industries are located at the bottom of the supply chain. Home-grown innovation has been weak and key technologies lacking, while China has struggled with an excess of low-end production capacity.

Now, however, China has started to establish innovation-based development. It is adjusting its economic structure, and no longer pursuing development at the cost of the environment. This new development path means that China has to lower its total energy consumption and change its energy framework to support further adjustments to its economic structure.

Third, the need to deal with smog is strengthening the resolve to tackle climate change.

Smog and greenhouse-gas emissions actually come from the same sources. The government has resolved to tackle air pollution by closing down heavily polluting and energy-intensive industries, restricting coal consumption, developing and using clean energy and limiting vehicle use. These measures also directly help reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, creating synergies to address climate change.

Fourth, tackling climate change and building China’s hoped-for “ecological civilization” are one and the same.

Building an ecological civilization [a concept first advanced by former president Hu Jintao] is the only choice China has if it is to break away from resource restrictions, environmental degradation and pollution – and it has a lot of public support. This ecological civilization requires encouraging people to respect, adapt to and protect nature, to focus on green and low-carbon development, and advancing the circular economy; and creating favourable environments for production and economic development, and a safe environment for people to live in.

We must reform our ways of production, our lifestyles, our system of values and our institutions, and innovate within these spheres. These goals are identical to those of tackling climate change.

Negotiating a deal that fosters innovation

Signatories to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are now negotiating a new climate deal. With the deadline for the new agreement (the end of 2015) looming, talks have reached a critical stage. Each country is engaged in deep discussions over the principles, structure, key elements, timelines and the legality of the deal.

Taking into account the positions of all the different parties to date, the new agreement must ultimately conform to one of three models -- top-down, bottom-up, or a combination of the two. For negotiation, and implementation, each of these has its advantages and deficiencies. The final deal must look at the whole world, but take into account the conditions of each country. We can only solve climate change when each nation adopts a model that fits its own circumstances as quickly as possible.

Every year for the past few years, China has published its existing and imminent climate-change measures and actions, and the country has made an enormous effort to honour its 2020 climate-change targets [China is committed to a 40-45% reduction in carbon intensity on 2005 levels by 2020]. Last year’s agreement at the climate change conference in Warsaw requires all countries to publish their “intended nationally determined contributions” by the first quarter of 2015. China has accelerated the completion of its own goals, and will come up with even more ambitious climate-change measures by the deadline. It is also actively promoting the catalytic effect of innovation in technology and systems in the new agreement.

Meanwhile, the new deal can be used as an opportunity to improve energy conservation and emissions reduction and to promote a whole series of institutional innovations to tackle climate change and motivate society to take part, including advancement of low-carbon technologies, better collection of emissions data, low-carbon trials and emissions trading.

Whether these measures are aimed at mitigating climate change, or adapting to its impacts, they all rely on technological and institutional innovations.

In short, China's economic and social development has reached a historical turning point where it must restructure its economy. Underlying demand will inevitably drive China to use increasingly aggressive measures and actions to address climate change. This is an irreversible process, and it will determine China's future.

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous


我相信中国仍旧可以实现2050年较2020年碳排放减少40% 到45%的目标。自从2005年开始大力发展有关控制碳排放的科技以来,这些技术,比如在沙漠种植碳吸附植物可以抵消中国在其他领域的碳排放。这些CO2吸收池可以是饲料作物或者是林业。中国有这个能力来捕捉CO2,以达到联合国气候变化框架公约碳交易所制定的CO2 100年安全储存约定。有了这个基础,中国可实现饲料作物自给自足和林业发展。它需要中国从上至下各级部门的理解和配合。

PRC can lower CO2e and poverty

PRC can still meet its pledge to a 40-45% reduction in carbon intensity on 2005 levels by 2020. By embracing the technology introduced from 2005 it can offset its CO2e emissions sequestering such into the science proven dedicated sequestering vegetation into desert. This CO2e sink vegetation grows soil food fodder and in time forestry. PRC has the ability to capture CO2 for the emitting world under UNFCCC emission trading 100 yrs safe storage rule. From this base China can become self reliant in food fodder and forestry. It demands top down understanding. Robert Vincin PRC appointed Foreign expert desert reversal