博客 Blog

China's rural regions - a growing CO2 source

On the first day of the climate-change talks in Tianjin, October 4, while delegates from all countries involved took the stage at the opening ceremony to express their determination in the meetings ahead,Chinese NGO the Global Environmental Institute (GEI) was focusing on the climate challenge in China's rural areas. 

In a side-meeting entitled “Energy in the countryside - an indispensable solution to climate change”, Dr Xiao Yunhan from the Chinese Academy of Sciences said: “The rate of increase in the consumption of energy from fossil fuels in the Chinese countryside has already surpassed that in the cities. In 2007, this figure was 9.42% in the countryside and 5.47% in the cities”.  

He also pointed out that the makeup of energy sources in rural areas has undergone a big shift: in 2001, non-fossil fuel sources accounted for 59% of total energy consumption, with fossil fuels 41%. The data for recent years shows a 29% to 71% split in favour of fossil-fuels.

Of the rural areas in which energy use is increasing, the regions around large cities are particularly notable. In 2008, the carbon-dioxide emissions of the countryside around Beijing and Shanghai were ranked first and second out of all rural areas in China.

The phenomenon of increasing energy use in the countryside seems to echo China’s continuous emphasis on the right to develop and the question, where China disagrees with the rest of the world, of when China’s emissions will peak and at what level. More and more organisations like GEI (at this side-meeting, they were bodies like S3IDF, GRES Cambodia and Nexus) are now paying close attention to the increase in greenhouse-gas emissions brought on by development in the countryside, and are using tools such as energy-efficient stoves to help local residents improve their lives at the same time as easing the pressure on the environment.

China’s cities have, in the past, introduced a much-trumpeted policy to promote energy-saving light bulbs.Similarly strong, energy saving, materially beneficial policies (such as the promotion of energy-efficient stoves) can also benefit farmers. It is just a question of when.

 

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default thumb avatar
gaidee

城乡之差别

我们城乡之差别由来久矣,几天几夜也说不清。我们城乡排放上的差别由来不久,也就那么二、三十年。解决城乡差别办法很多,最基本的就是大幅度提高农产品价格,给我们的农民兄弟的工作定个“市场价”。可是这个可能嘛?城市简单的能源问题还没有解决好,又要拿老实巴交的农民开刀,试图解决这个能折磨死人的广大农村的能源问题,好像不大厚道吧。

Urban and Rural Difference

Talking about the urban and rural difference that has been here for quite a long time, I can go on forever. However, the emission difference is something new, only having been here for twenty or thirty years. There are many solutions to eliminate or reduce the urban and rural difference in emission. The most fundamental one is to increase the price of agricultural products by a large scale, compensating the hard work of our peasant brothers with a fair market price. But, is it likely to happen? Back to the discussion of emission difference, the urban energy problem as simple as it seems now has not been solved yet; it just doesn't seem fair to attack the benefits of the forbearing and undemanding peasants at this stage in order to tackle the excruciating rural energy problem.