博客 Blog

Chinese official heaps praise on NGOs

Xie Zhenhua (left) meets Chinese NGO workers Fei Xiaojing and Lu Sicheng.


During the Tianjin talks, senior Chinese official Xie Zhenhua praised China's NGOs for their important role in the fields of environmental protection and climate-change. In the past, such open support for NGOs from senior Chinese figures has been rare. 

Xie Zhenhua is the highest-ranking official responsible for climate and carbon-reduction negotiations in the State Council, China's chief administrative body. On the afternoon of October 8, Xie, the assistant head of the National Development and Reform Commission, talked with a group of NGOs for two hours. He said he hopes to frequently meet and exchange ideas with China's NGOs, and welcomes NGO oversight of the government's work.   

Over 60 Chinese NGOs, including chinadialogue, SEE, Shanshui, Friends of Nature and Greenpeace's China office, attended the climate meetings in Tianjin, and there were an unprecedented 20-plus side meetings organised there as well. This is the biggest case yet of China's NGOs working together with the greater international movement.

China's top environmental NGO, Friends of Nature, was founded in 1994, but at that time China's civil society was still developing very slowly. After 2000, the number of NGOs in China soared and the most active domains were the environment, public health and assistance to the poor. The Chinese government showed a mixed attitude towards the development of NGOs; it was totally aware of how the "public participation" represented by NGOs could become a major trend, and that NGOs could help alleviate the social issues in the three areas mentioned above, but it still held doubts about the movement as a whole. As a result, the development of China's NGOs hasn't been smooth, as registration is still tedious and many NGOs can only list as companies.

Xie Zhenhua was previously head of China's Bureau of Environmental Protection, and under his watch the bureau's deputy head, Pan Yue, lent strong support for environmental NGOs' participation in public affairs. After Xie Zhenhua's appointment as assistant head of the National Development and Reform Commission for climate-change affairs, China's climate-change NGOs began communicating with the government with much greater ease. This September in Beijing, Li Gao, one of China's high-level negotiators, said that the National Development and Reform Commission's climate department had organised a briefing with some NGOs and informed them of the current situation. Various arms of the Chinese government have reached out to the NGOs -- something that is hardly ever seen in other areas.

Analysts think there are a few central reasons for this. First, during his tenure at the Bureau of Environmental Protection, Xie Zhenhua cooperated well with the NGOs and began to understand how important they could be for management of the environment. Second, environmental NGOs avoid politics, and all have strong hopes of working together with the government. Third, Xie Zhenhua and the National Development and Reform Commission's climate department had a broad international scope, understanding the development and use of NGOs abroad and not believing, as some Chinese officials do, that NGOs only have political goals.

In a meeting on October 8, Xie Zhenhua said that before the Copenhagen conference, he travelled to America to conduct dialogue with more than 100 American NGOs and saw an outstanding result. He said that, in the coming years, China's NGOs could play a highly important role in environmental protection and responding to climate change. "We hope NGOs can become the bridge and bond between society, the common people, and the government," he said.

Image by Lu Sicheng.

 

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default thumb avatar
gaidee

难成气候

我们的社会性质决定了NGO难成大气候,恐怕在亚洲也是这样。这当然不是说NGO不好,或者无能,实际情况是我们的政府掌握着最充足的社会资源以及资源的调拨能力,要钱有钱、要人有人,什么都不缺,搞到现在也不过如此。反观我们的NGO,基本的生存条件都不具备,在节能减排的竞赛中,你怎么和政府竞争呢?谈到经济实力,美国的自然资源保护委员会(NRDC)有150万会员,每年的预算大约8000多万美元,有几十个律师。所以,可以在有些场合和政府PK一下。NGO的成功的基础在于有了民意的支持,以及乐意捐献的人民,目前看来我们还有很长的路要走,很长很长。

Difficult to amount to anything

The nature of our society renders it very difficult for NGOs to amount to anything. I'm afraid that it may well be the same in the rest of Asia. Of course, I'm not saying NGOs are bad, or useless, but the fact is that our government has a grip on the lion's share of societal resources and the means to allocate them: if they need money they can get it, if they need people they can get them - they lack for nothing, and this is the same even today.
On the other hand, even the most basic conditions for an NGO's survival are not fulfilled. How do you compete with the government in the race to save energy and reduce emissions? America's Natural Resources Defence Council (NRDC) has 1.5 million members, an annual budget of over 80 million dollars, and dozens of lawyers, so they have the economic clout to take on the government in this area. Public opinion and willing donors are the basis for an NGO's success. At the moment it looks like we have a long way to go, a very long way to go.

Default thumb avatar
gaidee

“和政府作对就是恶”吗?

这好像是大多数政府的共识。NGO看来和黑社会也差不多,只不过没有暴力而已。

“和政府作对就是恶”,是以权力作为判断“善恶”的唯一标准,这在逻辑上是说不通的,因为政府的权力不是“神授”,而是来自于人民,只有人民才是“善恶”的最终评判者。

政府不仅是可以反对的,更是可以更换的。依靠人民,尊重人民群众的主体地位,既是无产阶级和马克思主义政党最根本的群众观,也是中国革命事业和社会主义建设事业的宝贵经验。

"Against the government is evil"?

Apparently this is the consensus of most governments. It seems that NGOs are almost the same as the criminal underworld, it's just that they are not violent.

"Against the government is evil", is using power as the only standard for judging "good and evil", logically this does not make sense, because the power of the government is not “godlike", but rather comes from the people, and only the people can be the final judge of "good and evil".

The government is not only something you can resist, it is also something you can change. Relying on the people, respecting the mass of people and their primary position, since it is the proletariat that is the Marxist party's most fundamental mass base, is also the precious experience of China's revolutionary project and building socialism.