博客 Blog

China should ditch some of its food self-sufficiency targets, says World Bank

An increase in animal feed imports may preserve land and water in China, but could have major implications for climate emissions and land use overseas

Article image

Rising demand from China for maize imports is likely to place even more pressure on Brazil’s remaining forest ecosystems (Image by CIFOR)

China has been urged to ditch some of its long-standing food self-sufficiency objectives in an effort to preserve its food security and resources.

Rapid changes in diet in the country – particularly the shift to eating more animal products – has seen a rise in imports of feed crops, including soy and maize.

Controversially, a new report from the World Bank now suggests China should allow these imports to continue to rise. “Such realignment would help China preserve land and save water,” says the report.

The World Bank has predicted China’s self-sufficiency rate in soy will drop to 14% by 2030, while its imports of maize will rise from 2% in 2012 to 15% by 2030.

The organisation goes on to say China should also put a greater emphasis on “improving the environmental sustainability” of its livestock sector, which has been criticised for its contribution to pollution.

However, the report makes no mention of the impact any shift to a greater reliance on food imports will have on land-use in major commodity exporting countries like Brazil.

China is already the largest purchaser of both soy and other agricultural commodities from Brazil – having recently jumped ahead of the EU.  

Its demand is helping to drive intensive farming into previously undeveloped areas of the richly biodiverse Brailzian Cerrado, say observers.

“The Cerrado in Brazil is fast becoming a soybean monoculture largely to feed the Chinese market,” says Janet Larson, from the Earth Policy Institute. “Soybean farmers have been pushing cattle farmers further into the Brazilian Amazon rainforest, leading to the burning of forest with impacts on local biodiversity, regional climate regulation and global carbon emissions.”

Around 40% of the growth in agricultural production in Latin America over the next 35 years is expected to come from opening up new areas of pastureland and forest to farming.

What’s more, China’s new demand for maize imports is likely to place even more pressure on Brazil’s remaining forest ecosystems.

“It’s going to be a real struggle between expanding production area in Brazil and people who are trying to limit deforestation,” says Emelie Peine, a global agribusiness specialist at the University of Puget Sound, Washington. 

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous




Food sovereignty and genetically modified crops

The great majority of the soy which China imports from South America - to feed pigs, thereby causing very much more social and environmental harm in South America than if the soy was fed to the people who live in China,- is genetically modified, including that which is certified by the Round Table on Sustainable Soy. The World Bank is presumably aware that this is jeopardising soy production in norther China - which is not genetically modified.

The recommendations of the World Bank (which is based in the USA) will also help the USA's export-oriented farming lobby.

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous




Fouling one's nest and moving on

China increasingly imports agricultural crops worldwide to satisfy growing demands at home. Yet for years, China, through careless behavior, has severely damaged its own renewable-resource base -- air, water, land/soil, vegetation, and wildlife -- the underpinings of agricultural productivity. This was done in the name of "economic development." China has done little to change its ways nor make repairs. Their solution now is to lean on the agricultural productivity and renewable resources of other countries. Chna's option to repair its damaged renewable resources still exists. "Fouling one's nest and moving on" is a practice that China should abandon.

Walter Parham, Ph.D.