文化 Culture

Novel reveals plight of China’s villages

Jia Pingwa’s new novel uses the story of a trafficked women to expose the growing crisis in rural China

Article image

“Rural residents have paid a terrible price for China's so-called modernization.” (Image by Mingjia Zhou)

Renowned novelist Jia Pingwa’s latest work, Jihua, tells the story of a trafficked woman called Butterfly to show the plight of China’s remote villages.  

When Butterfly’s father passes away she and her mother leave their village for the city, where they make a living shifting through rubbish. Butterfly is full of hope for her new life, but when she tries to find a job she becomes the victim of human trafficking and is sold to a poor family in a remote village in north-west China.

Butterfly is imprisoned in a cellar by Heiliang, the man who buys her. He and several other men rape her and she gives birth to a baby boy. Having a child gives her more freedom and she manages to phone her mother and the police, who come to rescue her after three years in captivity. She then returns to the city but finds herself looked down upon by the locals. Unable to bare being ridiculed and missing her son, she eventually returns to the village she was sold to.

The title of the novel is taken from a plant valued in Chinese medicine. The villagers collect the plant as it fetches a high price – Heliang’s mother dies after she slips on a steep slope while collecting the plant.


Speaking at the book launch, Jia said that the novel is based on the experiences of the daughter of a friend from his own village ten years ago.

Jia also emphasised that he wanted to show the reality of life in China’s most remote villages and expose an underlying crisis, rather than produce a thrilling tale.
 

The cities are gaping mouths, swallowing up money and goods from the villages.


Jihua continues my years of examination of rural society,” Jia said. “The villages have been in decline for a long time now. I’ve seen many empty of people, with buildings in ruins and weeds knee height. We’ve lost the villages, and with them our ancestral homes.”

A gradual decline

Through Heiliang, Jia explains why the villages are in decline: “The government’s developing the cities, now the cities are like gaping mouths, swallowing up money and goods from the villages, swallowing up all the village girls, ” he says in the novel.

Jia himself is from a peasant family, and only left his village in the north-western province of Shaanxi at the age of nineteen. The decline of the villages pains him. The character of Heiliang is treated with sympathy and understanding and ultimately Butterfly returns to him. Jia hopes China’s villages can survive.

Jia describes the “Butterflys” (the trafficked women) as being too easily fooled. “Don’t you have to blame Butterfly? Why did she have to be so easily conned?” He also explained why Heiliang bought a wife: “If he didn’t buy a wife, he’d never have one and the village would die out.”

Heiliang’s family is not the only one to take drastic measures to secure their lineage. The village head proudly says six wives have been purchased in the past several years.

Backlash

Jia’s novel attracted fierce criticism. He was accused of defending the traffickers and of putting the plight of men who cannot find a wife above the suffering of women. The role of women, critics argue, is reduced to providing sexual services and continuing the family name. Many readers objected to Butterfly returning to Heiliang, feeling she should have rejected that option.

Others complain that the novel mourns the loss of village life, while ignoring the evils they conceal. Such
backwards village ways should die out, they say. A legal expert reviewing the book wrote that almost every character is a criminal – trafficking is a crime, rape is a crime, even the violence used by the police during Butterfly’s rescue is a crime.

But author Liang Hong praised Jia for portraying difficult social issues, adding that finding a wife is a grave problem for rural men in a country with a large gender imbalance. Jia Pingwa’s Jihua doesn’t make simple moral judgements – it explores the soul of the protagonist.

Bleak reality

The village Jia depicts in his novel is a suffocating place: women are trafficked, “
ghost marriages” are arranged for the deceased and the elderly kill themselves. The air of tragedy is set right at the start, when a 73-year-old man commits suicide by drinking pesticide, as he was unable to stop his daughter-in-law eloping with another man after his son leaves to work in the city.

China’s villages are declining in real life as well. According to Feng Jicai, deputy chair of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles and chair of the China Folk Literature and Art Association, China had 3.6 million villages in 2000 – but only 2.7 million by 2010. In one decade 900,000 villages disappeared, almost 250 per day.

Most young people have left the remaining villages to find work, leaving the children and the elderly behind

Death of Butterfly’s dream

China’s
powerful push for urbanization has seen huge numbers of rural residents relocate to the cities – with an estimated 240 million migrants nationwide. However the cities have not welcomed them with open arms.

Butterfly dreams of leaving the village behind for a new life in the city, but reality shatters this hope. She is sold for 35,000 yuan (US$5,300) to a poor village. When she is rescued and returns to the city where she is made fun of, she is ultimately forced to flee back to the countryside.

Professor Wang Junbo, 
of Hunan University, describes migrant workers as “sugar cane” – the cities chew them up for their strength and intelligence while they are young and spit them out once they grow old. Cities are unwelcoming to older migrant workers, who mostly return to their villages: “That’s the ultimate fate of the first generation of migrant workers.”

That older generation still miss their villages. But their children are no longer accustomed to rural life – meaning they are neither accepted in the city or at home in the villages.

After Chinese New Year festival this year, Huang Deng, a professor at Guangdong University of Finance,
wrote of her experiences visiting her husband’s home village in Hubei province, sparking a nationwide debate.

Huang wrote that “rural residents have paid a terrible price for our so-called modernization.” But society still struggles to give them the chance to improve their circumstances. Education was once the only route out for a village child, but there are currently minimal resources for rural education, and with many parents away working in cities the children left behind are suffering.

Children of trafficked women often meet with tragedy with no parents to care from them. In September 2015, the
Chinese media reported that four children in Bijie, Guizhou province, had committed suicide by drinking pesticide – the youngest was only five. Their father had left to find work and their mother has been “stolen away” three years earlier.

As rural populations fall, schools are closing. According to a report edited by Yang Dongping, director of the 21st Century Education Research Institute, an average of 30 elementary schools and three junior middle schools were closed every day between 2000 and 2010.

A sample study across ten provinces found that primary school pupils live on average over five kilometres from their schools, while junior middle school pupils live almost 17 kilometres away. These distances contribute to high drop-out rates. Children who accompany their parents to the cities struggle to get into good schools. They are not eligible to attend mainstream schools and so poor quality “migrant worker schools” are often the only option.

Unsurprisingly, the number of rural students entering top universities has also declined. Liu Yunshan of the school of education at Peking University estimates that between 1978 and 1998, rural students made up 30% of Peking University’s intake. But that figure started to fall in the mid-1990s and has now stands at about 10%. Educational expert Yang Dongping has found that the number of rural students attending China’s other key universities has also been falling since 1990.

To leave the village and make a home in the city may seem a simple enough dream, and it is one the new generation holds even more fervently. But will they be luckier than their parents?

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

The Statistics Used Here

Do the statistics used here, particularly on loss of villages and rural schools, take into account villages being combined into single villages or towns, or consumed by urban areas for land redevelopment?

-Carwyn

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

強盜邏輯

“这个蝴蝶,你不需要怪她吗?你为什么这么容易上当受骗……”他也为“黑亮们”辩护为何不得已买卖妇女,“如果他不买媳妇,就永远没有媳妇,这个村子就消亡了。”
強盜邏輯= =

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

令人震撼的故事

这篇文章非常打动人。贾平凹一定是一位很出色的作家,如果他仅凭这篇第三方的文章就可以打动我的话;刘琴把贾的故事中很好的诠释了出来。我目前居住在英国,巴基斯坦裔。上世纪六十年代我在北京度过了童年的一段时光。那真是一个奇幻的世界,好多年过去,也已经变得很遥远。我不认同那条认为这是强盗逻辑的评论。我希望能有简单的解决办法,但显然没有。

塔里克 · 萨利姆

Terribly Moving Story

I found this article terribly moving. Jia Pingwa must be an exceptionally good writer, if he manages to move me in this way at third hand; and Liu Qin has succeeded in conveying the story very well. I am a person of Pakistani origin living in the UK, and I spent a part of my childhood in Beijing in the 1960s a magical world long ago and far away. I do not agree with the comment that this is rubber logic. I wish there was some easy solution, but obviously there is not.

Tariq Salim